Zaragoza, Spain
City population: 687448
Duration: 2008 – 2012
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Project area: unknown
Type of area: Industrial, Public Greenspace Area
Last updated: October 2021

The North Green Belt was developed and built up in connection to investments and structures for the 2008 Expo. (Ref. 1,2) The North Green Belt is a series of connections extending the green corridor and network of green spaces in Zaragoza, with the Ebro and Gallego rivers as the two main axes of the belt. (Ref. 1,2)

Source: Ref. 3

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Grey infrastructure featuring greens
  • Blue infrastructure
  • Riverbank/Lakeside greens
  • Parks and urban forests
  • Green corridors and green belts

Key challenges

  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Habitat and biodiversity restoration
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Regeneration, land-use and urban development
  • Regulation of built environment
  • Health and well-being (SDG 3)
  • Enabling opportunities for physical activity
  • Creation of opportunities for recreation

Focus

Creation of new green areas, Maintenance and management of urban nature

Project objectives

- Design a north green belt that fits and connects into the green ring around the whole city. (ref 5) - Further incorporate the Gallego river into the green networks of the city. (Ref. 4) - Develop and connect the former industrial areas along the banks of the Ebro as green spaces in the city (ref 4) - Increase the vegetation along with the bike and pedestrian paths of the green corridor (ref 4) - Provide clear and thorough signage for users of the green corridor. (ref 5) - Increase access of citizens to "little known" areas of and around the city. (ref 1)

Implementation activities

-The whole north belt is divided into six sections, each completed as a sub project of the larger ring: 1. Section of the Ebro 5.3 km long; 2. Gallego Sur 3.8 km long; 3. Gellego Norte 6.3 km; 4. San Gregorio 5.4 km; 5. Parque Goya 5.2km; 6. Parque del Agua 3.9km or 4.1km (ref 1) -Areas next to route will benefit from reforestation, creation of urban gardens, and equipment installations (Ref. 2) - Provide signage (Ref. 2)

Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities

Biodiversity restoration:

  • Rehabilitate and restore damaged or destroyed ecosystems
  • Restore ecological connectivity

Main beneficiaries

  • Local government/Municipality
  • Citizens or community groups

Governance

Management set-up

  • Government-led

Type of initiating organisation

  • Local government/municipality

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Unknown

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

Ayuntamiento de Zaragoza (City Council) leading the project and providing maintenance budget (ref 1 and 2)

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Unknown
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown
... a local policy or strategy? Yes (Urban Development Plan - Plan de Organizacion Urbana, Zaragoza 2007 )

Financing

Total cost

More than €4,000,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Public local authority budget
  • Other

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget
  • Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)

Non-financial contribution

Unknown

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Green space and habitat
  • Promotion of naturalistic styles of landscape design for urban development
  • Increased green space area
  • Increased conversion of degraded land or soil
  • Increased ecological connectivity across regeneration sites and scales

Economic impacts

  • Unknown

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved access to urban green space
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
  • Cultural heritage and sense of place
  • Promotion of cultural diversity
  • Other

Type of reported impacts

Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References