From 1850 to 1956 the area Eskesberg was a limestone mine, after that up until 1972 it served as a landfill. When taken over by the city of Wuppertal, groundwater contamination and outgassing required a large remediation to remove toxic substances and recover the area according to nature conservation guidelines. (Ref. 8) Since 2005, it has been turned into a nature conservation area covering 8.5 ha where several rare plants and animals have resettled and thus the area also serves as an important recreational space for residents (Ref. 1, 2, and 3). The project was initiated by the local government, who also collaborate with different partners for maintaining the nature conservation area, such as the biological station, which organizes excursions, performs monitoring on the terrain and sets up bee hives. Also, residents apart from visiting the area can actively participate in its maintenance as volunteers, guided by the city of Wuppertal and the NGO Biologische Station Mittlere Wupper. Furthermore, the nature conservation association of Wuppertal and scientists from the university of Cologne are involved in the intervention by conducting research on the terrain (Ref. 1, 2, 3 and 6).
Overview
Nature-based solution
- Parks and urban forests
- Large urban parks or forests
Key challenges
- Water management (SDG 6)
- Improvements to water quality
- Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
- Habitat and biodiversity restoration
- Habitat and biodiversity conservation
- Green space creation and/or management
- Environmental quality
- Soil quality improvement
- Waste management
- Regeneration, land-use and urban development
- Conversion of former industrial areas
- Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
- Effective management
Focus
Project objectives
Implementation activities
Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities
Biodiversity conservation:
- Protect and enhance urban habitats
- Preserve and strengthen existing habitats and ecosystems
- Create new habitats
- Reduce negative impacts and avoid the alteration/damage of ecosystem
- Protect species
- Undertake specific measures to protect species
- Undertake specific measures to protect native species
- Undertake specific measures to protect endangered species
- Undertake specific measures to protect valued species
- Means for conservation governance
- Manage biological resources for conservation and sustainable use
- Raise public awareness
- Public engagement
- Create and use scientific knowledge for conservation
- Capacity building
Biodiversity restoration:
- Rehabilitate and restore damaged or destroyed ecosystems
- Restore species (native, endangered, or unspecified)
- Restore native species
- Restore valued species
- Restore endangered species
- Restore ecological connectivity
- Public engagement
Main beneficiaries
- Citizens or community groups
- Other
Governance
Management set-up
- Government-led
Type of initiating organisation
- Local government/municipality
Participatory approaches/ community involvement
- Taskforce groups
- Dissemination of information and education
- Co-management/Joint management
- Other
Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project
Project implemented in response to ...
Financing
Total cost
Source(s) of funding
- Public regional budget
- Public local authority budget
Type of funding
- Earmarked public budget
Non-financial contribution
- Provision of labour
- Citizens (e.g. volunteering)
Impacts and Monitoring
Environmental impacts
- Environmental quality
- Improved waste management
- Improved soil quality
- Green space and habitat
- Increased number of protection areas
- Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
- Increase in protected green space areas
- Increased conversion of degraded land or soil
- Reduced biodiversity loss
- Increased number of species present
- Increased protection of threatened species
- Enhanced support of pollination
- Restoration of derelict areas
Economic impacts
- Unknown
Socio-cultural impacts
- Social justice and cohesion
- Improved liveability
- Improved access to urban green space
- Increased opportunities for social interaction
- Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
- Health and wellbeing
- Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
- Education
- Increased support for education and scientific research
- Increased knowledge of locals about local nature
- Increased awareness of NBS and their benefits
- Other
Type of reported impacts
Presence of formal monitoring system
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
References
2. Stadt Wuppertal (no date b) Deponie und Naturschutzgebiet Eskesberg. Available at: Source link 20 Sept. 2020]
3. Stadt Wuppertal (no date a) Biotoppflege im NSG Eskesberg. Available at: Source link 20 Sept. 2020]
4. Umwelt Bundesamt (2016) Böden in Wuppertal- Deponie Eskesberg. Available at: Source link 20 Sept. 2020]
5. Biologische Station Mittlere Wupper (2009) Jahresbericht 2008. Solingen. [Weblink unavailable in 2020]
6. Nobis, H. L. (2011) Eskesberg. Eine Deponie mit der Folgenutzung Naturschutzgebiet. Wuppertal. [Weblink unavailable in 2020]
7. Bezirksregierung Düsseldorf (2012) Umweltschutz-Altlasten / Bodenschutz. Sanierungsplanregelungen / -pläne. [Weblink unavailable in 2020].
8. Ingenieurgesellschaft für Planung, Beratung und Organisation. (nd.) Rehabilitation of the former Eskesberg-West landfill, Wuppertal. [online]. Available at: Source link [Accessed: 20 Sept. 2020].
9. Wikipedia. (2020). Grube Eskesberg. [online]. Available at: Source link [Accessed: 20 Sept. 2020].
10. Wuppertals Grüne Anlagen. (2011). Kalkofenpark. [online]. Available at: Source link [Accessed: 20 Sept. 2020].
