, Canada
City population: 663615
Duration: 2010 – ongoing
Implementation status: Ongoing
Scale: Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Project area: unknown
Type of area: Previous derelict area, Residential, Natural Heritage Area/Untouched nature, Public Greenspace Area
Last updated: October 2021

"In Winnipeg, there are several downtown neighbourhood groups (such as the Spence Neighborhood Association, and the West Broadway Community Organization) that make use of vacant urban space for the benefit of indigenous communities, and encourage them to maintain green spaces, ‘tot lots’, and a network of dozens of community gardens. There are also community-led indigenous ‘healing lodges’, Indigenous gardens, medicine gardens, as well as a land-based education programs (e.g. Marymound) using gardening to help at-risk indigenous youth heal from trauma and build resilience in these neighbourhoods." (1 p41). One such community gardens are the Chief Grizzly Bear’s Garden (in its official, Anishinaabe name: Ogimaa Gichi Makwa Gitigaan) focusing on increasing the visibility of the indigenous community in the Spence Neighbourhood and providing public space for gathering and traditional indigenous ceremonies honoring their connection to nature. The garden is also the place for cultivating native plants significant for traditional medicine practices (1). Another NBS initiative supporting the indigenous community in Winnipeg will be the Clan Mothers Healing Village and Knowledge Centre (CMVH) initiated by The Elders of Winnipeg. The CMVH will be located in rural Manitoba and provide a land-based, nurturing community living environment for indigenous women and youth who have been victims of intergenerational trauma, sexual/domestic violence, or human trafficking and support their reintegration into society. (1,2)

Source: https://clanmothers.ca/building-the-village/

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Parks and urban forests
  • Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces
  • Community gardens and allotments
  • Community gardens

Key challenges

  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Regeneration, land-use and urban development
  • Conversion of former industrial areas
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Social cohesion
  • Social justice and equity
  • Social interaction
  • Health and well-being (SDG 3)
  • Improving mental health
  • Improving physical health
  • Creation of opportunities for recreation
  • Cultural heritage and cultural diversity
  • Preservation of natural heritage
  • Promotion of cultural diversity
  • Preservation of historic traditions

Focus

Creation of new green areas, Maintenance and management of urban nature, Transformation of previously derelict areas, Knowledge creation and awareness raising, Other

Project objectives

Winnipeg is home to Canada's largest indigenous population, however, their social inequality is one of the greatest challenges the city faces which due to the increasing number of indigenous people moving into the city from rural reserves has become an even pressing issue. Regardless of some reconciliation efforts, indigenous people still feel the prolonged impacts of oppressing legislation measures and laws of the past (e.g.: The Indian Act of 1876 or the Indian Residential School System of the 1880s-1990s) including violence, homelessness, access to healthy food (1). However, some grass-root organisations and associations building on recent reconciliation efforts started initiatives supporting the well-being and equity of indigenous people in Winnipeg. The objectives of this initiative include: 1) "Tackling systemic poverty, violence and unhealthy lifestyles through utilizing vacant green space for the benefit of inner-city Indigenous communities" 2) "Rehabilitating Indigenous women in a safe environment with land-based education and ancestral methodologies" (1 p7) Chief Grizzly Bear’s Garden (1) 1) Increase the visibility of the indigenous community in the Spence Neighbourhood 2) Creation of a space of social interactions and spiritual gatherings (ceremonies, stewardship of the land, connect elders and youth) 3) Supporting native plants especially those with medicinal importance for the indigenous community Clan Mothers Healing Village (1): 1) "Providing support and restorative programs to at-risk Indigenous women and youth who have been victims of intergenerational trauma, sexual/domestic violence, or human trafficking" (1 p 43) 2) Development of a profitable social enterprise to sustain the Healing Village 3) Creation of a knowledge centre where education and training is offered to indigenous women 4) Network and collaboration with indigenous and non-indigenous organisations and experts

Implementation activities

"- Regeneration and creation of inner-city Indigenous green public spaces, such as the Ogimaa Gichi Makwa Gitigaan Park - Inner-city Healing Lodge and naturalized garden - Preparation of a contemporary, sustainable, nature-based, healing village and knowledge centre, self-governed by Indigenous women" (1 p 7)

Main beneficiaries

  • Marginalized groups: Other

Governance

Management set-up

  • Led by non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Non-government organisation/civil society
  • Citizens or community group
  • District/neighbourhood association
  • Social enterprise

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Unknown

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

The Ogimaa Gichi Makwa Gitigaan garden was created and is maintained by the Inner-City Aboriginal Neighbours (ICAN) citizen group in collaboration with the Spence Neighbourhood Association (SNA). The garden is governed by a steering community with the support of other citizen groups, associations and partner organisations. The city of Winnipeg supports the garden with an annual financial contribution and some maintenance services (grass, trees, waste bins). The governance of the Clan Mothers Healing Village reflects the ancestral matrilineal governance culture of the First Nations with indigenous women as leaders. "Clan Mothers Inc. is a non-profit registered charitable organization that will manage the programming for the Healing Village, while Clan Mothers Enterprises Inc. will be a non-profit registered organization that will manage the social enterprises" (1 p45) The Healing Village is also guided by several independent councils and committees (1,2).

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? No
... a national policy or strategy? No
... a local policy or strategy? No

Financing

Total cost

Unknown

Source(s) of funding

  • Corporate investment
  • Funds provided by non-governmental organization (NGO)
  • Private Foundation/Trust
  • Angel / informal investors

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget
  • Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)
  • Donations

Non-financial contribution

Type of non-financial contribution
  • Provision of land
  • Provision of labour
  • Provision of expertise
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
  • Citizens (e.g. volunteering)

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Green space and habitat
  • Increased green space area
  • Increase in protected green space areas

Economic impacts

  • Increase of green jobs (e.g. paid employment positions)
  • Generation of income from NBS

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Safety
  • Increased perception of safety
  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved social cohesion
  • Improved access to urban green space
  • Increased visibility and opportunity for marginalised groups or indigenous peoples
  • Increased opportunities for social interaction
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Improved mental health
  • Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
  • Cultural heritage and sense of place
  • Improvement in people’s connection to nature
  • Protection of historic and cultural landscape / infrastructure
  • Preserved spiritual and religious values
  • Education
  • Increased support for education and scientific research

Type of reported impacts

Expected impacts, Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References