New York, United States
City population: 474893
Duration: 1990 – ongoing
Implementation status: Ongoing
Scale: Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Project area: unknown
Type of area: Residential, Protected Area, Public Greenspace Area, Building, Other
Last updated: April 2022

The Bluebelt programme in Staten Island was implemented as it "preserves natural drainage corridors including streams, ponds, and wetlands, and enhances them to perform their functions of conveying, storing, and filtering runoff precipitation or stormwater". (Ref. 2). By delivering "stormwater to engineered systems that are designed to mimic natural streams and ponds which...meander or wind back and forth, the water slows down naturally" (Ref. 1). These actions are intended to "help control flooding, pollution and erosion" (Ref. 2), whilst also providing open green areas for both local communities and a "diverse habitat for wildlife" (Ref. 2). Beginning in 1990, the Bluebelt programme has undergone continual expansion, recognising that "as New York City prepares for rising sea levels and heavier rains due to climate change, Bluebelts offer a natural and effective solution for stable and sound stormwater management" (Refs. 2 & 4). The Bluebelt now includes approximately 400 acres of freshwater wetland and riparian stream habitat and 11 miles of stream corridor (Ref. 4).

Sweet Brook Bluebelt Section
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/dep/water/the-bluebelt-program.page

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Blue infrastructure
  • Lakes/ponds
  • Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
  • Coastal wetland, mangroves and salt marshes
  • Parks and urban forests
  • Green corridors and green belts

Key challenges

  • Climate action for adaptation, resilience and mitigation (SDG 13)
  • Climate change adaptation
  • Environmental quality
  • Soil quality improvement
  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Habitat and biodiversity restoration
  • Habitat and biodiversity conservation
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Regeneration, land-use and urban development
  • Regulation of built environment
  • Promote natural styles of landscape design for urban development
  • Water management (SDG 6)
  • Flood protection
  • Stormwater and rainfall management and storage
  • Improvements to water quality

Focus

Creation of new green areas, Creation of semi-natural blue areas, Management and improved protection of rivers and other blue areas, Ecological restoration of ecosystems, Protection of natural ecosystems, Improved governance of green or blue areas

Project objectives

Due to the pace of residential development on Staten Island during the 1970s and 1980s, concurrent factors arose regarding inadequate drainage infrastructure, high reliance on septic tanks, and development of unsuitable land, including on "the historic flow paths of the natural creek system of the area" (Refs. 1 & 4). Residential developments were therefore prone to flooding: a "recurring pattern of winter and spring floods wash[ed] through new developments sited in these historic paths", and "wet weather compromised poorly designed septic systems, compounding the impact of these floods" (Ref. 4). As a result, "the area was prone to frequent localized flooding and erosion due to uncontrolled stormwater, and degraded water quality caused by failing septic systems" (Ref. 5). The intervention was therefore introduced as a way to reduce flooding of property and quell "growing public outcry", reduce sewer output into the natural environment, and additionally "preserv[e] some of the Island's threatened natural stream habitats" (Ref. 4).

Implementation activities

The programme emphasises the preservation of "natural drainage corridors including streams, ponds, and wetlands, and enhanc[ing] them to perform their functions of conveying, storing, and filtering runoff precipitation or stormwater" (Ref. 2). By protecting and restoring these waterways, the bluebelt system provides an "excellent mechanism for reducing urban flooding and improving the health of local waterways, [and] also provide[s] open green space for their communities and diverse habitat for wildlife since they are not constricted by closed pipes or underground infrastructure like traditional storm sewers" (Ref. 2). In addition to promoting conservation and restoration of natural waterways, by avoiding the construction of artificial drainage systems, degradation of the natural ecosystem has further been avoided (Ref. 1). In addition to focusing on the waterways themselves, the project further "works to preserve, restore, and enhance the land around the natural waterways in the area. Many plants grow naturally at the edges of the Bluebelt, and these plants help create a more natural ecosystem for birds, frogs, turtles and mammals" (Ref. 1). Specific species of plants are chosen for introduction along the waterways, with native plants being specifically chosen for planting "because their roots are home to beneficial bacteria that help clean the water", and "other species [being] chosen specifically to attract or feed other helpful species" (Ref. 1). By considering plants at the species level, development/restoration of the ecosystem as a whole is sought, "Designing a system like this helps create new habitats for native species" (Ref. 1).

Climate-focused activities

Climate change adaptation:

  • Implement measures that prevent/manage desertification, soil erosion and landslides
  • Restore wetlands and/or coastal ecosystems to dissipate the effects of flooding and/or storms
  • Implement sustainable urban drainage infrastructure (e.g. to make space for water)
  • Renaturalization of rivers and other water bodies

Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities

Biodiversity conservation:

  • Protect and enhance urban habitats
  • Preserve and strengthen existing habitats and ecosystems
  • Create new habitats
  • Preserve and strengthen habitat connectivity
  • Reduce negative impacts and avoid the alteration/damage of ecosystem
  • Protect species
  • Undertake specific measures to protect species
  • Undertake specific measures to protect native species

Biodiversity restoration:

  • Rehabilitate and restore damaged or destroyed ecosystems
  • Restore species (native, endangered, or unspecified)
  • Restore native species

Main beneficiaries

  • Citizens or community groups

Governance

Management set-up

  • Government-led

Type of initiating organisation

  • Regional government
  • Local government/municipality

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Other
  • Unknown

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

The project was initiated in 1990 by the Commissioner of the New York City Department of Environmental Protection and the Director of the New York City Water and Sewer System, who subsequently hired "Dana Gumb, a talented land use planner familiar with Staten Island who had also been exploring land-use strategies to deal with floodwater management", to manage the project (Ref. 4). Following completion of a cost-benefit analysis by the Department of Environmental Protection, the project was proposed "to the Budget Bureau, City Hall and the City Planning Commission for their blessing, as it was a policy that would cut across the concerns of all of these and other agencies" (Ref. 4). The New York City (NYC) Department of Environmental Protection continues to lead the project (Refs. 2 & 5), with the NYC Department of Transportation and NYC Department of Design and Construction also being involved (Ref. 2).

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? No
... a national policy or strategy? No
... a local policy or strategy? Yes (Although not originally implemented in response to a location regulation, the success of the project has now seen it be incorporated into local regulation, "The ultimate testimony to the success of the Bluebelt concept is that the Staten Island Bluebelt has now been incorporated as a part of the official drainage plan for Staten Island and the City of New York" (Ref. 4). Whilst begun as a 'voluntary' intervention, the project has now, therefore, transitioned into a 'mandatory' intervention, as selected below.)

Financing

Total cost

More than €4,000,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Public regional budget
  • Public local authority budget

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget

Non-financial contribution

Unknown

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Climate change
  • Strengthened capacity to address climate hazards/natural disasters
  • Environmental quality
  • Improved soil quality
  • Water management and blue areas
  • Improved water quality
  • Increased protection against flooding
  • Improved stormwater management
  • Enhanced protection and restoration of freshwater ecosystems
  • Green space and habitat
  • Promotion of naturalistic styles of landscape design for urban development
  • Increased green space area
  • Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
  • Increased ecological connectivity across regeneration sites and scales
  • Increased number of species present

Economic impacts

  • Increased property prices
  • Reduce financial cost for urban management

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Safety
  • Improved community safety to climate-related hazards
  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved liveability

Type of reported impacts

Expected impacts, Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References

Left: Constructing a wetland; Right: Carefully planned landscaped zones remove pollutants while maintaining biodiversity
https://urbanomnibus.net/2010/12/the-staten-island-bluebelt-storm-sewers-wetlands-waterways/
Information about this nature-based solution was collected as part of the UNA global extension project funded by the British Academy.