Two of Sheffield's rivers, the Limb Brook and the Porter Brook, have been identified as having strong populations of native white-clawed crayfish. The native crayfish is under pressure from the alien, invasive American signal crayfish and the crayfish plague. If no action is taken, the white-clawed crayfish populations in Sheffield could become extinct in a few years. Crayfish Action Sheffield aims to maintain and increase Sheffield’s native crayfish populations through habitat enhancement, public education and creation of bio-secure 'Ark' sites. It is a collaborative research project and Sheffield Crayfish Working Group’s members are from a range of conservation organizations. (ref3) The First time Crayfish Action plan was implemented in 2008-14 and after it ended in 2014, again the issue was looked in 2017. (ref 5)
Overview
Nature-based solution
- Blue infrastructure
- Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
Key challenges
- Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
- Habitat and biodiversity restoration
- Habitat and biodiversity conservation
Focus
Project objectives
Implementation activities
Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities
Biodiversity conservation:
- Protect species
- Undertake specific measures to protect species
- Undertake specific measures to protect native species
- Undertake specific measures to protect endangered species
- Undertake specific measures to protect valued species
- Control and clean invasive alien species
Biodiversity restoration:
- Restore species (native, endangered, or unspecified)
- Restore native species
- Restore endangered species
Main beneficiaries
- Local government/Municipality
- Researchers/University
Governance
Management set-up
- Co-governance with government and non-government actors
Type of initiating organisation
- Researchers/university
Participatory approaches/ community involvement
- Dissemination of information and education
Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project
Project implemented in response to ...
Financing
Total cost
Source(s) of funding
- Public local authority budget
- Private Foundation/Trust
Type of funding
- Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)
Non-financial contribution
Impacts and Monitoring
Environmental impacts
- Green space and habitat
- Increased number of protection areas
- Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
- Increased number of species present
- Increased protection of threatened species
- Improved prevention or control of invasive alien species
Economic impacts
- Unknown
Socio-cultural impacts
- Education
- Increased support for education and scientific research
- Increased knowledge of locals about local nature
- Increased awareness of NBS and their benefits
Type of reported impacts
Presence of formal monitoring system
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
References
2.Arthur, C. (2012). The Distribution Of The American Crayfish (Pacifastacus Leniusculus) In The Don River Catchment, South Yorkshire, UK. Lancaster Environment Center. Lancaster. Accessed at: Source link [Accessed 21 July 2020].
3. Sheffield, University. (2017). Saving Sheffield's white-clawed crayfish - Projects - What work has been done? Project index - Don Catchment - The University of Sheffield. [online] Source link. Accessed at: Source link [Accessed 21 July 2020].
4. Evans A. (2014). Endangered species in Sheffield dealt ‘major blow’ by plague. The Star. Accessed at: Source link (not accessible)
5. Dingler, M., 2018. Sheffield State Of Nature 2018. [online] Sheffield: Nature Counts. Available at: <Source link [Accessed 16 July 2020].
6. Hobson, W., 2019. The Crayfish In Crisis Project In The South West Peak District. [online] Derbyshire Life and Countryside. Available at: <Source link [Accessed 21 July 2020].
