Sevilla, Sevilla (FUA), Spain
City population: 1305342
Duration: 1992 – 2015
Implementation status: Completed and archived or cancelled
Scale: Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Project area: unknown
Type of area: Public Greenspace Area
Last updated: November 2021

Recreation and Educational orchards were created as part of the Miraflores Park interventions and rehabilitation. These orchards were available for public use and had educational programs where the children would learn and cultivate the land. The Orchards were formed of four separate programs: Huertos Escolares (School Orchards), Huertos de Ocio (Leisure Orchards), Educational Itineraries, and Youth Greenhouse. (Ref 4)

Source: Ref. 7

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Parks and urban forests
  • Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces
  • Community gardens and allotments
  • Allotments
  • Community gardens
  • Horticulture
  • Nature in buildings (indoor)
  • Other

Key challenges

  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Habitat and biodiversity conservation
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
  • Inclusive governance
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Social justice and equity
  • Social interaction
  • Environmental education
  • Environmental and climate justice
  • Health and well-being (SDG 3)
  • Creation of opportunities for recreation
  • Economic development and employment (SDG 8)
  • Economic development: agriculture
  • Cultural heritage and cultural diversity
  • Preservation of natural heritage
  • Protection of historic and cultural landscape/infrastructure
  • Preservation of historic traditions
  • Sustainable consumption and production (SDG 12)
  • Sustainable consumption
  • Sustainable production

Focus

Creation of new green areas, Maintenance and management of urban nature, Knowledge creation and awareness raising

Project objectives

- Facilitate knowledge of the environment through experience to increase the awareness of inter-relations of the physical surroundings and human activity. Thus, strengthening individual commitments and actions toward the environment. (Ref. 5) - Promote bio-agriculture, encouraging the use of local resources, renewable energies and organic waste. (Ref. 5) - Development of a cooperative working structure of solidarity and collectivist to encourage participatory decision processes. (Ref. 5) - Empower citizen participation in the General Project of the Miraflores Park. (Ref. 5) - Promote the rehabilitation and knowledge of the identity of agricultural-history of the residents of the Macarena district. (Ref. 5) - Have members act toward the defense of the environment. (Ref. 5) - Upkeep the orchard/ gardens as a type of eco-museum for the cultivation activities that have been ongoing. (Ref. 5)

Implementation activities

1963- Plans begin in the City organizational plan (PGOU) (Ref 3) 1991- Start of the School Orchards program (Ref 1) School gardens used for primary school garden education (Ref 4) 150 m2 of leisure gardens for the elderly in the neighborhood (Ref 4) Educational itineraries for visiting schoolchildren (Ref 4) Greenhouse for further green education for the youth (Ref 4) 2015/2016- Orchards closed by the municipality (Ref 7,8)

Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities

Biodiversity conservation:

  • Protect species
  • Take measures for ex situ conservation
  • Means for conservation governance
  • Manage biological resources for conservation and sustainable use
  • Raise public awareness
  • Public engagement
  • Capacity building

Main beneficiaries

  • Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
  • Citizens or community groups
  • Marginalized groups: Elderly people
  • Food producers and cultivators (i.e. farmers, gardeners)
  • Young people and children

Governance

Management set-up

  • Led by non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Citizens or community group
  • District/neighbourhood association

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Co-planning (e.g. stakeholder workshops, focus groups, participatory mapping)
  • Taskforce groups
  • Dissemination of information and education
  • Consultation (e.g. workshop, surveys, community meetings, town halls)
  • Joint implementation (e.g. tree planting)
  • Co-management/Joint management
  • Citizen oversight (e.g. boards, advisory)

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

Pro-Educational Miraflores Park Committee- development of the socio-educational program at the orchard. (Ref 3) City council of Sevilla (Ayuntamiento)- The orchards are in a park that is municipal land (Ref 3); provided funding (Ref 3) AMPAs (Associations of Mothers and Fathers) - Schools coordination for participation in the educational program at the orchards. (Ref 1) Management and decision making of the orchards is done by an assembly composed of members who use the orchards and by a representative of each of the orchard's programs. (Ref 3) 5 permanent members were chosen as representatives that organized acting on the necessities of the orchard and solutions to issues. (Ref 3)

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Unknown
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown
... a local policy or strategy? Yes (1963 PGOU (Urban organizational plan) defines the limits for the construction of the park. (only executed 20 years later) (Ref 3))

Financing

Total cost

€50,000 - €100,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Public local authority budget

Type of funding

  • Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)

Non-financial contribution

Type of non-financial contribution
  • Provision of land
  • Provision of goods
  • Provision of labour
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
  • Public authorities (e.g. land, utility services)
  • Citizens (e.g. volunteering)

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Green space and habitat
  • Increased green space area

Economic impacts

  • Unknown

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved access to urban green space
  • Increased visibility and opportunity for marginalised groups or indigenous peoples
  • Increased opportunities for social interaction
  • Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
  • Increased access to healthy/affordable food
  • Increased sustainability of agriculture practices
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
  • Cultural heritage and sense of place
  • Improvement in people’s connection to nature
  • Protection of natural heritage
  • Protection of historic and cultural landscape / infrastructure
  • Increased sense of place identity, memory and belonging
  • Increased awareness of flora and fauna as culturally and historically meaningful
  • Education
  • Increased knowledge of locals about local nature
  • Increased awareness of NBS and their benefits

Type of reported impacts

Expected impacts, Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References

Source: Ref. 7
Source: Ref. 7