Rouen, France
City population: 484661
Duration: 2008 – ongoing
Implementation status: Ongoing
Scale: Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level, Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Project area: 100000 m2
Type of area: Natural Heritage Area/Untouched nature
Last updated: June 2024

"Formerly a 10 hectare market gardening site, the Repainville area is rich in environmental potential: ponds, streams, springs ... the aquatic environment is present everywhere. There is a great variety of fauna and flora. As an ecosystem that is particularly rare in urban areas, protection and recovery measures are being undertaken" (Ref. 1). The restoration of the wetland of Repainville is part of a flagship project of the municipality in terms of safeguarding biodiversity in urban areas. With arrangements allowing the public to walk there without harming the biological and natural diversity of the place, the site has an educational dimension in order in particular to make young audiences aware of the preservation of the ecosystem (Ref. 7).

https://rouen.fr/repainville

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Blue infrastructure
  • Lakes/ponds
  • In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
  • Community gardens and allotments
  • Allotments
  • Community gardens
  • Grey infrastructure featuring greens
  • Railroad bank and track greens
  • Nature on buildings (external)
  • Green walls or facades
  • Parks and urban forests
  • Large urban parks or forests

Key challenges

  • Climate action for adaptation, resilience and mitigation (SDG 13)
  • Climate change adaptation
  • Environmental quality
  • Soil quality improvement
  • Air quality improvement
  • Waste management
  • Noise reduction
  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Habitat and biodiversity restoration
  • Habitat and biodiversity conservation
  • Water management (SDG 6)
  • Improvements to water quality
  • Cultural heritage and cultural diversity
  • Preservation of natural heritage
  • Health and well-being (SDG 3)
  • Enabling opportunities for physical activity
  • Creation of opportunities for recreation
  • Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
  • Inclusive governance
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Social interaction
  • Environmental education
  • Economic development and employment (SDG 8)
  • Economic development: agriculture
  • Sustainable consumption and production (SDG 12)
  • Sustainable consumption
  • Sustainable production

Focus

Management and improved protection of rivers and other blue areas, Ecological restoration of degraded ecosystems, Protection of natural ecosystems, Monitoring and maintenance of habitats and/or biodiversity

Project objectives

-"The objective is to exploit this exceptional wetland of 10 hectares to the height of its environmental potential by making it a natural urban park and giving it back its title of green lung of Rouen." (Ref. 2) -"Our wish is to open this site to the greatest number of people, to make it a space of walk in respecting the equilibrium of the ecosystem" (Ref. 5) -"The project is co-developed around the three functions of the site: familial and community gardens (existing since 2010), environmental education and market gardening" (Ref. 2) -"Co-planning the project with all stakeholders" (Ref. 5) - "Wetlands... are "carbon sinks" that contribute to the alleviation of global warming" (Ref. 1).

Implementation activities

-"An organic vegetable gardener has just been installed on a plot of 2 hectares by the association of the "Champ des Possibles" and should be able to sell its products to the public next year." (Ref. 2, year 2016) -Construction of cabins for family gardens (Ref. 5). -A work to rehabilitate ponds was launched in the summer of 2016 (Ref. 5) "Environmental valuation of the range of natural environments and wetlands: -Creation of a biodiversity reserve -Management of certain plots by eco-grazing -Renaturation of watercourses -Phytoremediation (alternative ecological technique that aims to biologically decontaminate polluted soils) -Charter of good practices -Education for the environment: development of a panorama and an educational pathway" (Ref. 3) -A course has been designed, forming a loop around the allotment gardens, with structures such as a pond observation platform, and a kiosk allowing the reception of the public for the observation of birds. A raised belvedere as well as bridges for crossing streams and benches have also been installed (Ref. 7). -"Now identified as the second cause of erosion of biodiversity after the degradation of ecosystems, the proliferation of invasive alien species represents a very real threat to the site of Repainville. Two plant species are particularly worrying in their capacity for proliferation: Knotweed from Japan (Fallopia japonica) and an American aster, presumably the willow-leaved aster (Aster salignus)" (Ref. 9). -"In places, we reach 80 decibels. The wall will reduce to 50, this is very acceptable ” , adds Jean-Michel Bérégovoy. The choice of the wall is in progress" (Ref. 9)

Climate-focused activities

Climate change adaptation:

  • Restore wetlands and/or coastal ecosystems to dissipate the effects of flooding and/or storms

Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities

Biodiversity conservation:

  • Protect and enhance urban habitats
  • Preserve and strengthen existing habitats and ecosystems
  • Promote environmentally-sound development in and around protected areas
  • Reduce negative impacts and avoid the alteration/damage of ecosystem
  • Protect species
  • Undertake specific measures to protect species
  • Undertake specific measures to protect native species
  • Control and clean invasive alien species
  • Means for conservation governance
  • Raise public awareness
  • Create and use scientific knowledge for conservation

Biodiversity restoration:

  • Restore species (native, endangered, or unspecified)
  • Clear and control invasive alien species
  • Restore ecological connectivity
  • Other

Main beneficiaries

  • Local government/Municipality
  • Non-government organisation/Civil Society
  • Citizens or community groups
  • Food producers and cultivators (i.e. farmers, gardeners)
  • Marginalized groups: People with functional diversities

Governance

Management set-up

  • Co-governance with government and non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Local government/municipality
  • Non-government organisation/civil society
  • District/neighbourhood association
  • Citizens or community group

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Co-planning (e.g. stakeholder workshops, focus groups, participatory mapping)
  • Dissemination of information and education
  • Consultation (e.g. workshop, surveys, community meetings, town halls)
  • Co-management/Joint management
  • Citizen oversight (e.g. boards, advisory)
  • Citizen monitoring and review

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

"Several associations occupy this site: the association of the gardens of the valley of the two rivers, Cardere, the association of protection of the natural site of Repainville which manages the family gardens ... These organizations will be directly part of the steering committee of the project, in the company of elected officials, city services, neighborhood councilors of Mont-Gargan and Grieu / Vallon-Suisse and the future market garden structure. It will be up to them to decide the future of the urban natural park" (Ref. 4). Partners in this intervention are: the City of Rouen, the Region of Normandy, the associations managing the family and community gardens ( and the organic horticulture garden (managed by "Champ des Possibles"), Association for the Protection of the Repainville Natural Site (APSNR), Regional Action Center for the Development of Environmental Education (CARDERE), Environmental associations: Groupe Mammalogique Normand, Ornithological Group Normand, Haute-Normandie Nature Environment, Conservatory of Natural Spaces of the region Haute-Normandie, Neighborhood Council of Mont-Gargan and Neighborhood Council Grieu, Vallon suisse, Saint-Hilaire. (Ref. 3)

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Unknown
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown
... a local policy or strategy? Unknown

Financing

Total cost

€500,000 - €2,000,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Public local authority budget
  • Public regional budget

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget

Non-financial contribution

Unknown

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Climate change
  • Lowered local temperature
  • Enhanced carbon sequestration
  • Environmental quality
  • Improved air quality
  • Improved waste management
  • Reduced noise exposure
  • Improved soil quality
  • Water management and blue areas
  • Improved water quality
  • Enhanced protection and restoration of freshwater ecosystems
  • Green space and habitat
  • Increase in protected green space areas
  • Increased number of protection areas
  • Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
  • Increased conversion of degraded land or soil
  • Reduced biodiversity loss
  • Increased protection of threatened species
  • Improved prevention or control of invasive alien species

Economic impacts

  • Increase in agricultural production (for profit or not)

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved access to urban green space
  • Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
  • Increased access to healthy/affordable food
  • Increased sustainability of agriculture practices
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
  • Cultural heritage and sense of place
  • Improvement in people’s connection to nature
  • Protection of natural heritage
  • Protection of historic and cultural landscape / infrastructure
  • Education
  • Increased support for education and scientific research
  • Increased knowledge of locals about local nature
  • Other

Type of reported impacts

Expected impacts, Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Yes

Presence of indicators used in reporting

Yes

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References

https://www.rouentourisme.com/parcs-jardins/parcours-de-decouverte-de-repainville-7112/#gallery-image-1