Roma, Italy
City population: 2611777
Duration: 2008 – 2010
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Project area: unknown
Type of area: Other
Last updated: October 2021

The Tiber is considered strategic to promote a policy of conservation and enhancement of the entire historic city. To transform what has become a "distance" in a resource for the city, it is necessary to involve the river in new spatial, functional, infrastructural and ecological relationships. The rediscovery of the river as a large ecological corridor permits the upgrading of some strong crosses of physical and functional connection to the opposite shores and corresponding enhancement of the river basin; Including the transverse Aventino / Porta Portese, divided into two functional lots, and the transversal Gianicolo-Moretta (1).

https://romatevere.hypotheses.org/266

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Grey infrastructure featuring greens
  • Riverbank/Lakeside greens
  • Blue infrastructure
  • Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries

Key challenges

  • Water management (SDG 6)
  • Flood protection
  • Improvements to water quality
  • Regeneration, land-use and urban development
  • Regulation of built environment

Focus

Protection of natural ecosystems, Improved governance of green or blue areas, Management of rivers and other blue areas

Project objectives

The general goal of the project is to re-qualify the Tiber basin in the metropolitan area of Rome in order to enhance its environmental role in the city (1 and 2). Control of pollution and water flow, as parts of a wider control of bio-hydrological imbalances, combined with the fundamental role of the river as a green corridor among different areas of the city (4).

Implementation activities

1. The consolidation of the historical boundaries of the Rocca Savella in one of the most spectacular tracts of the Aranci Garden to the city; 2. Extensive archaeological excavation on the municipal property area below the terrace of the Giardino degli Aranci: 3. The Documentation Center for Urban Transformations and the New Access Port to Aventino (II Lotto Functional); 4. The recovery of Raffaele De Vico's garden along the slopes of S. Sabina; Conservation of the original design of De Vico; Integration with new pedestrian paths to the north and south; Overall thinking of plant design; 5. The redesign of the Lungotevere Aventino and the path along the Tiber; 6. The upgrading of the twentieth-century riverbed (1).

Main beneficiaries

  • Local government/Municipality
  • Citizens or community groups

Governance

Management set-up

  • Government-led

Type of initiating organisation

  • Local government/municipality

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Dissemination of information and education

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

The Municipality of Rome is behind the project and finances the NBS with its public budget (1 and 2). The NBS intervention is part of a more general plan focused on re-qualifying several green areas connected to grey infrastructures in Rome: the General Regulation Plan (4).

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Unknown
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown
... a local policy or strategy? Yes (Roma Capitale Law provided new financing for this natural re-qualification project. The project is also part of the new General Regulation Plan of the city (1 and 4). )

Financing

Total cost

More than €4,000,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Public local authority budget

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget

Non-financial contribution

Unknown

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Unknown

Economic impacts

  • Unknown

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Unknown

Type of reported impacts

No impacts reported

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References