Milano, Italy
City population: 3063361
Duration: 2011 – ongoing
Implementation status: Ongoing
Scale: Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Project area: unknown
Type of area: Agricultural area or farmland, Previous derelict area
Last updated: November 2021

The conservation of agricultural activities allows for the preservation of the landscape for all, with the possibility to offer to Milaners a place of leisure, tranquility, nature and tradition within the city, where to taste - also while tasting the products of the earth - what is the the Milanese agricultural world. It is located in the South West of Milan, within the Parco Agricolo Sud, in an area between the two Navigli, the Grande and the Pavese (1).

http://bekala.de/bekala---parco-delle-risaie.html

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Parks and urban forests
  • Large urban parks or forests
  • Other
  • Blue infrastructure
  • Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
  • Other

Key challenges

  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Habitat and biodiversity conservation
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Environmental quality
  • Soil quality improvement
  • Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
  • Inclusive governance
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Environmental education
  • Health and well-being (SDG 3)
  • Creation of opportunities for recreation
  • Economic development and employment (SDG 8)
  • Economic development: agriculture
  • Tourism support
  • Cultural heritage and cultural diversity
  • Preservation of natural heritage
  • Protection of historic and cultural landscape/infrastructure
  • Preservation of historic traditions
  • Sustainable consumption and production (SDG 12)
  • Sustainable consumption
  • Sustainable production

Focus

Creation of new green areas, Ecological restoration of ecosystems, Transformation of previously derelict areas, Other

Project objectives

The NBS has the following goals: - Promotion of an integrated landscape planification. - Protection of landscape diversity. - Quality improvement in the local environment, including cultural heritage, buildings, public spaces and landscapes. - Incentivizing initiatives for the promotion of diversified tourist offers, flows redistribution and valorization of neglected areas. - Education of local tourist businesses for more sustainable practices. - Conservation and requalification of existing natural landscapes. - Involvement of residents and rising awareness. - Promotion of a sustainable culture through public participation in the decision-making process. - Promotion of innovative and sustainable landscape planning. - Following the targets set by the European Convention on Landscapes (1).

Implementation activities

The proposing subject, together with the partners involved, intends to implement the scenario in a deeply "bottom up" mode, using the involvement of the stakeholders directly concerned - owners, farmers, inhabitants of the area - and others - entities, associations, committees, citizens - in the participatory design process, implementation and realization of the Risai Park. The design scenario was developed through a participatory design process: a collaboration between the Risai Park Association, farmers, citizens and architects Gioia Gibelli and Silvia Beretta. Regarding the specific phases in terms of environmental re-qualification and sustainability: new green infrastructures are being built to meet the needs of local agricultural businesses and stimulate sustainable tourism. This implies the planting of new trees and different species, the restoration of water basins and the recovering of derelict areas. Local businesses will participate in offsetting emissions too (6 and 2).

Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities

Biodiversity conservation:

  • Protect and enhance urban habitats
  • Preserve and strengthen existing habitats and ecosystems
  • Preserve and strengthen habitat connectivity
  • Reduce negative impacts and avoid the alteration/damage of ecosystem
  • Means for conservation governance
  • Manage biological resources for conservation and sustainable use
  • Raise public awareness
  • Public engagement
  • Create and use scientific knowledge for conservation

Main beneficiaries

  • Local government/Municipality
  • Public sector institution (e.g. school or hospital)
  • Non-government organisation/Civil Society
  • Private sector/Corporate/Company
  • Citizens or community groups
  • Food producers and cultivators (i.e. farmers, gardeners)
  • Young people and children

Governance

Management set-up

  • Co-governance with government and non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Local government/municipality
  • Non-government organisation/civil society

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Crowd-sourcing/Crowd-funding/Participatory budget
  • Dissemination of information and education
  • Consultation (e.g. workshop, surveys, community meetings, town halls)
  • Joint implementation (e.g. tree planting)
  • Co-management/Joint management
  • Citizen oversight (e.g. boards, advisory)
  • Other

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

Promoters of the project are: Associazione Parco delle Risaie and Connecting Cultures. They launched the project in cooperation with the Municipality of Milan and financed by the Cariplo Foundation. NBS is strongly at the center of the plan, together with cultural and business focus (1 and 2). Part of the founding was from the Cariplo Foundation and partly from the municipality of MIlan, provided by the EU budget for sustainable solutions and in the budget for the EXPO 2015 (1 and 2). The proposing subject, together with the partners involved, intends to implement the scenario in a deeply "bottom up" mode, using the involvement of the stakeholders directly concerned - owners, farmers, inhabitants of the area - and others - entities, associations, committees, citizens - in the participatory design process, implementation and realization of the Risai Park. The design scenario was developed through a participatory design process: a collaboration between the Risai Park Association, farmers, citizens and architects Gioia Gibelli and Silvia Beretta (6 and 2)

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? No (It was an initiative deriving from the imminent Expo 2015 and a clear need of local agricultural producers (2). )
... a national policy or strategy? No (It was an initiative deriving from the imminent Expo 2015 and a clear need of local agricultural producers (2). )
... a local policy or strategy? Yes (The rehabilitation of the area through this NBS was part of the strategic plan developed by the Parco delle Risaie Association, as written in its statute. Furthermore, it is strongly connected to the City of Milan project for the re-qualification of specific areas in occasion of the Expo in 2015 (2). )

Financing

Total cost

€2,000,000 - €4,000,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Public local authority budget
  • Private Foundation/Trust

Type of funding

  • Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)
  • Donations

Non-financial contribution

No

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Climate change
  • Lowered local temperature
  • Reduced emissions
  • Enhanced carbon sequestration
  • Water management and blue areas
  • Increased protection against flooding
  • Improved stormwater management
  • Green space and habitat
  • Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
  • Increased number of species present

Economic impacts

  • More sustainable tourism

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved access to urban green space
  • Increased visibility and opportunity for marginalised groups or indigenous peoples
  • Increased access to healthy/affordable food
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Improved physical health
  • Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
  • Cultural heritage and sense of place
  • Improvement in people’s connection to nature
  • Education
  • Increased awareness of NBS and their benefits
  • Other

Type of reported impacts

Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Yes

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

Yes

References

http://bekala.de/bekala---parco-delle-risaie.html
http://bekala.de/bekala---parco-delle-risaie.html