Lublin, Poland
City population: 348914
Duration: 2017 – 2019
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Sub-microscale: Street scale (including buildings)
Project area: unknown
Type of area: Residential
Last updated: October 2021

The project created a friendly green recreation area for the elderly in the neighbourhood where there is a lack of spaces dedicated to the elderly. The plans involve the revitalization of a neglected square, plantings assorted greenery and preservation of the existing trees. The NBS should foster physical activity and social inclusion of the elderly residents in the neighbourhood, as well as to lead to the revitalization of the district and improved standards of living [1,2].

Senior citizen's square in Lublin
Source: https://kurierlubelski.pl/tatary-dostana-nowy-skwer-ma-byc-gotowy-do-konca-czerwca-2018/ga/12686504/zd/26353672

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Parks and urban forests
  • Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces

Key challenges

  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Regeneration, land-use and urban development
  • Regulation of built environment
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Social justice and equity
  • Social cohesion
  • Social interaction
  • Health and well-being (SDG 3)
  • Enabling opportunities for physical activity
  • Improving mental health
  • Improving physical health
  • Creation of opportunities for recreation

Focus

Maintenance and management of urban nature, Improved governance of green or blue areas

Project objectives

-To create a senior-friendly recreational area; -To revitalise the neglected neighbourhood space by organising it and managing the neglected trees; -To facilitate the physical activity for the local population and their social inclusion; -To revitalise the district and improve the standards of living in the neighbourhood [2].

Implementation activities

1. Removing old asphalt pavement on the square. 2. Preservation of the blossoming trees on the square. 3. Greenery planting (trees, low hedges, shrubs) 4.Greening of the neglected sites. 5. Central flower composition planted with perennial plants 6. Providing benches, outdoor gym and paths dedicated to the elderly only 7. Providing CCTV in the neighbourhood [1]

Main beneficiaries

  • Citizens or community groups
  • Marginalized groups: Elderly people

Governance

Management set-up

  • Co-governance with government and non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Citizens or community group

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Co-planning (e.g. stakeholder workshops, focus groups, participatory mapping)
  • Crowd-sourcing/Crowd-funding/Participatory budget

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

Citizens developed a research proposal and applied for funds for its implementation. After evaluation and adjustment, in 2019 the project was implemented by the relevant bodies of the local government.

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Unknown
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown
... a local policy or strategy? Yes (Green participatory budget of Lublin, which aims to increase the greenery in the city. (1))

Financing

Total cost

€100,000 - €500,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Public local authority budget

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget

Non-financial contribution

Unknown

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Green space and habitat
  • Promotion of naturalistic styles of landscape design for urban development

Economic impacts

  • Unknown

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved social cohesion
  • Fair distribution of social, environmental and economic benefits of the NBS project
  • Increased opportunities for social interaction
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Improved physical health
  • Improved mental health
  • Gain in activities for recreation and exercise

Type of reported impacts

Expected impacts, Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Yes

Presence of indicators used in reporting

Yes

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

Yes

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References