Uricani , Iaşi (FUA), Romania
City population: 342738
Duration: 2016 – 2021
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Project area: 1066900 m2
Type of area: Protected Area
Last updated: March 2025

This initiative focused on creating a management plan for the Uricani forest, a protected area located near Iasi. Designated as both a nature reserve and a Natura 2000 site, the forest is crucial for its "Dacia oak & hornbeam forests" habitat and the presence of the stag beetle, the largest beetle in Romania and Europe. Despite existing nature protection designations, the environmental NGO "Asociația Ecoturistică Prietenii Pădurii Bălțătești" recognized the need for an updated management plan. With European funding, the NGO developed a model plan for protected areas in Neamt and Iasi counties, including Uricani forest. The NGO conducted monitoring activities in cooperation with forestry directorates to assess habitat conditions and stag beetle populations. The goal was to identify risks and requirements for species conservation and design appropriate management actions. Additionally, the organization aimed to promote the area's tourism potential and conduct awareness-raising activities with local communities and schools. The completed management plan, developed through public consultation and approved by the Romanian environmental ministry, included measures for natural habitat regeneration, ensuring suitable conditions for the stag beetle, addressing illegal logging, pasturing, and waste disposal, and establishing information points and educational activities for the community. (1-7)

Informative bulletin on protected area
http://www.bxm.ro/iasi/index.php/galerii-foto?AG_MK=0&AG_form_paginInitPages_0=1&AG_form_albumInitFolders_0=Galerii_foto/Uricani&AG_MK=0

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Parks and urban forests
  • Large urban parks or forests

Key challenges

  • Environmental quality
  • Waste management
  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Habitat and biodiversity restoration
  • Habitat and biodiversity conservation
  • Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
  • Inclusive governance
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Environmental education
  • Sense of community and community engagement
  • Economic development and employment (SDG 8)
  • Tourism support

Principal problems in Functional Urban Area (FUA)

  • Environmental Degradation
  • Invasive alien species
  • Deforestation and forest degradation
  • Health, Well-being and Social cohesion
  • Poor community engagement
  • Resource Scarcity and Competition
  • Over-exploitation of natural resources (water resources, overgrazing, fisheries, mangroves, fore products)
  • Other

Key priorities

Biodiversity (conservation and/or restoration), Social Justice and community

Focus

Ecological restoration of ecosystems, Restoration and protection of ecosystems (including water ecosystems), Protection of natural ecosystems, Habitat restoration, Habitat conservation, Knowledge creation and awareness raising, Educational and awareness raising programs, Improved governance of green or blue areas, Establishment of inclusive governance mechanisms involving local communities, Monitoring and maintenance of habitats and/or biodiversity, Clearing out invasive alien species and allow natural regeneration maintaining the functionality the ecosystem, Habitat mapping, restoration and monitoring-focused management, Species-specific monitoring and conservation programs

Project objectives

To describe and evaluate the current state of biodiversity in the area, along with its environmental and socioeconomic conditions. (2, p.4) To define the outcome indicators for management actions necessary to conserve and regulate activities in the area.(2, p.4) To plan spatial and periodical measures to ensure the conservation of the stag beetle and oak and hornbeam forests (including clearance of invasive species), considering traditional and current local community activities.(2, p.4) To manage anthropocentric activities in the area, such as waste disposal or grazing, through regulations and sanctions.(2, p. 50) To raise awareness and inform the local population about the natural area, facilitating access to resources and increasing the area's tourist appeal. (2, p. 50, 51) To include relevant stakeholders in the design of the management plan and involve the local community . (4,5)

Implementation activities

For the plan: 1. A database was developed about the forest habitat, the stag beetle, and the environmental and socioeconomic context in which they exist (5). This took into account the limits of the protected area, existing forms of land ownership and management and land use regimes (5). 2. An education unit was involved to educate and disseminate information on general notions related to nature protection and the protected area (5). The participants were also able to learn about specialised equipment for field study and use it (5). 3. Public consultations were carried out with relevant stakeholders (representatives of forestry directorates, the local communities, the environmental protection agencies and forest rangers, land owners) to include their suggestions in the plan (5). Once developed, the plan was released for public consultations (5). The plan was then adopted by the Iasi forestry directorate, which: 4. Prepared a budget and informed labour needs for the management actions (2, p. 93). 5. Designed regeneration, conservation, and management activities to protect the oak forest and ensure habitat for the beetle (2, p. 78). These included management of illegal logging and pasture, and waste disposal and clearing invasive species (2, p. 78). 6. Creation of public information points and educational activities for the surrounding communities (2, p. 82). 7. Previews biodiversity monitoring and ecotourism related activities (2, p. 85 to 88).
Communities vulnerable to environmental hazards or climate change impacts
Yes

Specification of climate or environmentally vulnerable communities

Low-income neighborhoods, Rural agricultural communities

Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities

Biodiversity conservation:

  • Protect and enhance urban habitats
  • Preserve and strengthen existing habitats and ecosystems
  • Reduce negative impacts and avoid the alteration/damage of ecosystem
  • Protect species
  • Undertake specific measures to protect species
  • Undertake specific measures to protect native species
  • Undertake specific measures to protect endangered species
  • Control and clean invasive alien species
  • Means for conservation governance
  • Raise public awareness
  • Create and use scientific knowledge for conservation

Biodiversity restoration:

  • Rehabilitate and restore damaged or destroyed ecosystems
  • Clear and control invasive alien species

Main beneficiaries

  • Local government/Municipality
  • Non-government organisation/Civil Society
  • Citizens or community groups
  • Young people and children

Governance

Management set-up

  • Led by non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Non-government organisation/civil society

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Co-planning (e.g. stakeholder workshops, focus groups, participatory mapping)
  • Taskforce groups
  • Dissemination of information and education
  • Consultation (e.g. workshop, surveys, community meetings, town halls)
  • Co-management/Joint management

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

The initiative was led by the environmental NGO "Asociația Ecoturistică Prietenii Pădurii Bălțătești" that applied for and got granted EU funds for Regional Development to create plans for several natural areas included the Uricani forest (5 to 7). They developed the specific model for Uricani in collaboration with the forest directorate of Iasi (5 & 6). In their design they included consultations for suggestions from representatives of a diverse range of interest groups (representatives of forestry directorates, the local communities, the environmental protection agencies and forest rangers, land owners) before and after (5 to 7). They included educational units to raise awareness and educate on the protected area (5 & 6). The management plan was adopted by the national environmental ministry and implemented through the corresponding directorates (2 to 4). The plan also previews constant monitoring by the directorates or individuals and activities for tourism (2, p. 85 to 88).

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Yes (Natura 2000 standards (5 & 6). )
... a national policy or strategy? Yes (Legea nr. 49/2011 of privind regimul ariilor naturale protejate, conservarea habitatelor naturale, a florei şi faunei sălbatice // Legea nr. 5/2000 aprobarea Planului de amenajare a teritoriului naţional // Ordinul ministrului mediului şi dezvoltării durabile nr. 1964/2007 // Ordinul ministrului mediului și schimbărilor climatice nr. 1052/2014 (4, p. 4 & 5). )
... a local policy or strategy? Unknown

Type of enablers

NGOs/Community groups driving the implementation, Support from transitional governance actors, Funds, subsidies or investment for GI/NBS in the city (available for the city or provided by the city)

Financing

Total cost

€50,000 - €100,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Public regional budget
  • EU funds

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget
  • Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)

Non-financial contribution

Type of non-financial contribution
  • Provision of expertise
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
  • Citizens (e.g. volunteering)

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Environmental quality
  • Improved waste management
  • Expected improved waste management
  • Green space and habitat
  • Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
  • Achieved increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
  • Reduced biodiversity loss
  • Expected reduced biodiversity loss
  • Increased protection of threatened species
  • Expected increased protection of threatened species
  • Improved prevention or control of invasive alien species
  • Expected improved prevention or control of invasive alien species

Economic impacts

  • Increase of green jobs (e.g. paid employment positions)
  • Expected increase of green jobs (e.g. paid employment positions)
  • More sustainable tourism
  • Expected more sustainable tourism

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
  • Achieved increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
  • Cultural heritage and sense of place
  • Improvement in people’s connection to nature
  • Expected improvement in people’s connection to nature
  • Increased appreciation for natural spaces
  • Expected increased appreciation for natural spaces
  • Education
  • Increased support for education and scientific research
  • Achieved increased support for education and scientific research
  • Increased knowledge of locals about local nature
  • Expected increased knowledge of locals about local nature

Type of reported impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Yes

Presence of indicators used in reporting

Yes

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

Yes

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

Potential risks of implementation and trade-offs

Unknown

References

Flower field in the middle of the forest
http://www.bxm.ro/iasi/index.php/galerii-foto?AG_MK=0&AG_form_paginInitPages_0=1&AG_form_albumInitFolders_0=Galerii_foto/Uricani&AG_MK=0
Protected beetle next to measurements in the field
http://www.bxm.ro/iasi/index.php/galerii-foto?AG_MK=0&AG_form_paginInitPages_0=1&AG_form_albumInitFolders_0=Galerii_foto/Uricani&AG_MK=0
naturescapes bannerInformation about this nature-based solution was collected as part of the Naturescapes project funded by the European Union under Grant Agreement No 101084341.