Den Haag, Netherlands
City population: 488605
Duration: 2016 – 2016
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Project area: unknown
Type of area: Public Greenspace Area
Last updated: October 2021

Slachthuisplein in the Hague, a large public grey square was transformed into a green ‘oasis’ which provides recreational facilities for adults and a playground for children. The citizens and children were involved in the design of the green square and the initiative was selected by the municipality as one of their climate change adaptation measures as it stores stormwater. (1,2,5).

Source: https://duurzaamdenhaag.nl/nieuws/slachthuisplein-is-een-groene-oase-voor-kinderen-en-ouders

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Grey infrastructure featuring greens
  • Green playgrounds and school grounds
  • Parks and urban forests
  • Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces
  • Community gardens and allotments
  • Community gardens

Key challenges

  • Climate action for adaptation, resilience and mitigation (SDG 13)
  • Climate change adaptation
  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Regeneration, land-use and urban development
  • Promote natural styles of landscape design for urban development
  • Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
  • Inclusive governance
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Social cohesion
  • Social interaction
  • Health and well-being (SDG 3)
  • Creation of opportunities for recreation

Focus

Creation of new green areas

Project objectives

1. Turn a grey square into a green 'oasis' where citizens can meet and children can play, which contributes to social cohesion and improves the quality of life in the neighbourhood. (1,4,5). 2. Social cohesion: citizens work together on initiatives to support social interaction on the square (6). Improvement of quality of life of citizens in the neighbourhood: by allowing for more types of exercise for children and by adding vegetation such as flowers. (4). 3. Promote citizens' participation in the park development process that also aims to strengthen the sense of belonging. Therefore, citizens were involved in the planning, the selection of the design and a part of the maintenance (4). Promote social equity, as employment-training opportunities for unemployed youths were created with the construction of the public square and activities are organized that increase the accessibility of citizens in need of help (6).

Implementation activities

- 50 children and citizens proposed ideas and made drawings regarding the development of the green public squares which led to three designs. Then, they were allowed to vote for the designs and the design with the most votes was realized. (4). - Removal of the former pavement and replacing it with grass and vegetation (including flowers) (4). - Creation of a small vegetable garden for women of Resto Van Harte (restaurant/NGO) (4)

Climate-focused activities

Climate change adaptation:

  • Increase or improve urban vegetation cover to help reduce outdoor temperature
  • Create or improve outdoor spaces to help people escape from urban heat

Main beneficiaries

  • Citizens or community groups
  • Marginalized groups: Elderly people, Other

Governance

Management set-up

  • Co-governance with government and non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Local government/municipality

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Co-planning (e.g. stakeholder workshops, focus groups, participatory mapping)
  • Dissemination of information and education
  • Co-management/Joint management

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

The municipality, the City Counsel Member Rabin Baldewsingh, initiated the project in light of the 'Wijkaanpak' (Neighbourhood Improvement Plan) (1,4,6). The neighbourhood is known for citizens with relatively low social-economic status and a large amount of 'grey areas' (lack of green spaces) (7). Rabin Baldewsingh mobilized citizens and children to come up with ideas for the design of the public square. Children made drawings and citizens proposed ideas and Jan Verburg of GKB Group (project developer) designed the green public square [4]. The project developer implemented the project and the public square is mainly maintained by the municipality but citizens and volunteers of a primary school also help with the maintenance (5).

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Unknown
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown
... a local policy or strategy? Yes (The 'Wijkaanpak Nieuw Stijl' (Neighbourhood Improvement Plan New Style) of the municipality in 2015, which is a strategy for 7 neighbourhoods in The Hague that are facing problems such as poverty and unemployment. In this plan, the municipality (financially) supports projects that improve social cohesion, living climate and citizen participation. The redevelopment of Slachthuisplan is one of the projects that is financed through this policy (6).)

Financing

Total cost

Unknown

Source(s) of funding

  • Public local authority budget

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget

Non-financial contribution

Type of non-financial contribution
  • Provision of goods
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
  • Citizens (e.g. volunteering)

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Water management and blue areas
  • Improved stormwater management
  • Green space and habitat
  • Increased green space area

Economic impacts

  • Increase of green jobs (e.g. paid employment positions)

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved social cohesion
  • Increased opportunities for social interaction
  • Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
  • Increased access to healthy/affordable food
  • Increased sustainability of agriculture practices
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Improved physical health
  • Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
  • Cultural heritage and sense of place
  • Promotion of cultural diversity

Type of reported impacts

Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References