Győr, Hungary
City population: 130308
Duration: 2010 – 2010
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Project area: 90000 m2
Type of area: Residential
Last updated: October 2021

In 2010 a new drainage system was installed in Traktoros Street that solved the disposal of surface-water so that bigger storms would not cause damages in the area and separates rainwater from the sewage. The rainwater is directed to the lake in Adyváros. The project was the third phase of the complex reconstruction of draining in the Szabadhegy neighbourhood. While the first two phases (the construction of the main pipelines and drainage of Pannónia Street; drainage of Vak Bottyán Street and paving streets) were financed by the municipality, the third phase was implemented with the help of the EU. (Reference 1, 2)

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Blue infrastructure
  • Lakes/ponds
  • Green areas for water management
  • Sustainable urban drainage systems

Key challenges

  • Water management (SDG 6)
  • Flood protection
  • Stormwater and rainfall management and storage

Focus

Other

Project objectives

- protecting the built environment: safe disposal of rainwater; - environmental protection: separated drainage system for rainwater and sewage (Reference 1); - liveability: renovation of the road for easier transportation (Reference 2).

Implementation activities

- a new drainage system was implemented in the length of 647 m, meaning the complete reconstruction of drainage in Traktoros Street and partly in Virág Street, Mozsár Street and Levendula Street (Reference 3); - separating rainwater from sewage, directing the rainwater towards the nearby reservoir; - installing drains and reconstructing the 30-40-year-old drinking water service-pipes; - renovating the pavement of Traktoros Street and paving 80 % of the side-walks (Reference 4).

Main beneficiaries

  • Citizens or community groups

Governance

Management set-up

  • Government-led

Type of initiating organisation

  • Local government/municipality

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Unknown

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

The Local Government of the of Győr won a non-refundable grant of HUF 67,988,499 for the settlement of the drainage problems of Traktoros Street in Győr-Szabadhegy in the Inland Water Management tender announced within the framework of the Western Transdanubia Operational Program. The program is co-financed between the EU and the national government. As the total cost of the implemented project is nearly 120 million HUF, Local Government of Győr supplemented the grant. (Reference 2)

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Yes (The project was implemented with the support of the ERDF and in line with the EU territorial cohesion objectives. (Reference 3))
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown (The project was implemented under the 2007-2013 National Strategic Reference Framework of Hungary (that aims to provide direction for the use of the EU Cohesion and Structural Funds). (Reference 3))
... a local policy or strategy? Yes (The drainage system of the neighborhood appeared in the city's strategy of urban development of 2008 (Reference 5).)

Financing

Total cost

€100,000 - €500,000

Source(s) of funding

  • EU funds
  • Public national budget
  • Public local authority budget

Type of funding

  • Earmarked public budget
  • Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)

Non-financial contribution

Unknown

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Climate change
  • Strengthened capacity to address climate hazards/natural disasters
  • Water management and blue areas
  • Increased protection against flooding
  • Improved stormwater management

Economic impacts

  • Unknown

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved liveability

Type of reported impacts

Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References