Coxbazar, Bangladesh
City population: 2289990
Duration: 2019 – 2021
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Meso-scale: Regional, metropolitan and urban level
Project area: 6000000 m2
Type of area: Previous derelict area
Last updated: April 2023

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and its partners collaborated in 2018 to develop an ecosystem restoration project in the Rohingya Camps of Ukhiya, near Cox's Bazar. The main objective of this project was to mitigate the increased risk of landslides, slope instability, and flooding caused by flash floods and the vicinity of the Bakkhali River. The intervention included the planting of quickly growing native trees, shrubs, and grass species. Additionally, the project encompassed other measures such as vegetable cultivation on stream beds, biological soil stabilization methods, and plant-based wastewater treatments. To ensure the sustainability of the project, a network of future practitioners from the Bangladeshi and Rohingya communities was created. Moreover, environmental education and awareness activities were undertaken to complement the efforts of the project, with a particular focus on engaging young people from both the host and refugee communities to maximize its impact. The area where the project was implemented has been significantly affected by land and forest degradation over the last few decades, which has been exacerbated since the arrival of Rohingya refugees in 2017. Therefore, the project also involved other stakeholders such as the International Center for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the Danish Refugee Council, the World Food Programme, the International Organization for Migration, and the Bangladesh government, each contributing in various capacities to achieve the project's objectives. (1,2,3,4)

Restoring degraded land and riverine areas in Rohingya Camps
Source: (Ref 1)

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Blue infrastructure
  • Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
  • Community gardens and allotments
  • Allotments
  • Grey infrastructure featuring greens
  • Riverbank/Lakeside greens

Key challenges

  • Climate action for adaptation, resilience and mitigation (SDG 13)
  • Climate change adaptation
  • Environmental quality
  • Soil quality improvement
  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Habitat and biodiversity restoration
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Water management (SDG 6)
  • Flood protection
  • Improvements to water quality
  • Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
  • Inclusive governance
  • Effective management
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Social cohesion
  • Environmental education
  • Sustainable consumption and production (SDG 12)
  • Sustainable consumption
  • Sustainable production

Focus

Creation of new green areas, Ecological restoration of ecosystems, Knowledge creation and awareness raising

Project objectives

The intervention was designed to achieve the following goals: 1. To build wider social-ecological resilience by fostering an environment that will enable strong refugee protection. (1) 2. To meet local challenges within the SDG framework through equal prioritisation of ecosystem preservation and human well-being. (1) 3. To implement several environmental restoration activities that address challenges related to flooding and water management. These interventions include stream restoration, riparian afforestation/reforestation, wastewater treatment, water reservoirs, conservation agriculture, silt trap piloting, stream bank protection, construction of walkways, environmental awareness-raising and education. (1) 4. To provide practical solutions to better utilise space in crowded settlements while enabling refugees to produce vegetables, support their own livelihoods and supply a nutritious diet. (3) 5. To mitigate environmental degradation in displacement settings as well as help displaced and host communities prepare and adapt to the foreseeable effects of climate change. (3)

Implementation activities

Prior to implementing the intervention, the Centre for Natural Resource Studies (CNRS) and UNHCR conducted a rapid assessment through a field assessment and participatory problem appraisal. The findings from this assessment informed the development of a set of nature-based interventions aimed at restoring the Madhur Chhara watershed. In 2019, UNHCR and CNRS implemented a pilot restoration project which focused on four streams of action: (i) water security/stream restoration, (ii) water pollution management, (iii) stream-bank stabilisation, and (iv) planting/regreening denuded camp areas. To achieve these actions, the project required the support of the refugee community and a skilled team with adequate knowledge of ecological restoration, ecosystem and watershed management, including renowned hydrologists and specialist consultants from both private agencies and line departments of the Government of Bangladesh. A silt trap was established in one of the camps in order to trap sand and silt in situ within a specific part of the stream channel, which enabled periodic extractions of sand/silt for productive purposes such as construction material. Technical assistance was provided by the Environmental Science Department of the University of Chittagong. The project also piloted a bacteria-based wastewater treatment plant in another camp, which was found to effectively remove pollutants from Lambasia Chhara. Afterwards, the project started planting Vetivers (Chrysopogon zizanioides) and various other local grasses such as bhadails (Cyperus rotundus), and broom grass (Thysanolaena latifolia) on banks and slopes, supported by bamboo poles. In 2019, a total of 21,000 tree seedlings were produced from the nursery and in 2020, 288,000 Vetiver saplings were raised and planted. Over the two years, a total of 144,000 tree seedlings were planted on 57.2 hectares of denuded land within the camp. Furthermore, the project provided awareness training to 3,000 refugees and supported 931 households in growing vegetables. An energy and environment technical working group coordinated activities and knowledge sharing across the camps. (1,2)

Climate-focused activities

Climate change adaptation:

  • Implement measures that prevent/manage desertification, soil erosion and landslides

Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities

Biodiversity conservation:

  • Protect and enhance urban habitats
  • Preserve and strengthen existing habitats and ecosystems
  • Protect species
  • Undertake specific measures to protect native species
  • Means for conservation governance
  • Raise public awareness
  • Public engagement
  • Create and use scientific knowledge for conservation

Biodiversity restoration:

  • Rehabilitate and restore damaged or destroyed ecosystems
  • Restore species (native, endangered, or unspecified)
  • Restore native species

Main beneficiaries

  • Local government/Municipality
  • Citizens or community groups
  • Marginalized groups: Refugees, asylum seekers, and migrants, Socio-economically disadvantaged populations (e.g. low-income households, unemployed)

Governance

Management set-up

  • Led by non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Non-government organisation/civil society

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Dissemination of information and education
  • Consultation (e.g. workshop, surveys, community meetings, town halls)
  • Joint implementation (e.g. tree planting)
  • Co-management/Joint management

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

The initiative has been proposed by UNHCR (as initiator and funder) and developed by UNHCR and its implementing partner, Centre for Natural Resource Studies (CNRS), which developed a detailed technical plan, adopting NbS approaches to restore the degraded riparian ecosystems. Other stakeholders involved were the International Center for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Danish Refugee Council, World Food Programme, International Organization for Migration, and the Bangladesh government in various capacities. (1, 3)

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Yes (This intervention was not created as a response to an EU Directive however from an international point of view sources mention UNHCR’s Strategic Framework for Climate Action as a strategy it responded to. (1))
... a national policy or strategy? Yes (Regular consultations with the relevant government departments, including the Forest Department, Department of Environment and Universities, ensured interventions were aligned with existing policies, rules and regulations but they are not developed upon. (1))
... a local policy or strategy? Unknown

Financing

Total cost

€100,000 - €500,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Multilateral funds/international funding

Type of funding

  • Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)

Non-financial contribution

Type of non-financial contribution
  • Provision of land
  • Provision of labour
  • Provision of expertise
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
  • Public authorities (e.g. land, utility services)
  • Citizens (e.g. volunteering)

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Climate change
  • Strengthened capacity to address climate hazards/natural disasters
  • Enhanced carbon sequestration
  • Environmental quality
  • Improved air quality
  • Improved soil quality
  • Water management and blue areas
  • Increased protection against flooding
  • Improved stormwater management
  • Reduced risk of damages by drought
  • Green space and habitat
  • Increased green space area
  • Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
  • Reduced biodiversity loss
  • Enhanced support of pollination

Economic impacts

  • Stimulate development in deprived areas
  • Reduce financial cost for urban management

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Increased access to healthy/affordable food
  • Education
  • Increased knowledge of locals about local nature
  • Safety
  • Increased perception of safety

Type of reported impacts

Expected impacts, Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Yes

Presence of indicators used in reporting

Yes

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References

Restoring degraded land and riverine areas in Rohingya Camps
Source: (Ref 2)
Before and after
https://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/Climate%20Action-Good%20Practice%20Coxs%20Bazar%20Bangladesh.pdf
Refugee camp
https://www.arabnews.pk/node/1965911/world
Information about this nature-based solution was collected as part of the "NBS 2022" UNA Asian extension project funded by the Asia-Europe Foundation.