Last updated: October 2021
"This 26-hectare park, the largest in Clermont-Ferrand, offers a privileged view of the city. Several wooded areas serve as shelters for permanent and passing wildlife. For the last two years, gardeners in the park have no longer used pesticides to maintain Montjuzet Park, the effects are already measurable on the enrichment of flora and fauna." "During the development of the Parc Montjuzet, the choice was made to keep 9 hectares without intervention. These hectares could be a source of some ecological richness. Hives have been established near this area since 2009." (Ref. 1) This park has the Refuge LPO label. (Ref 2)
Overview
Nature-based solution
- Parks and urban forests
- Large urban parks or forests
- Other
- Community gardens and allotments
- Community gardens
- Intentionally unmanaged areas
- Abandoned spaces with growth of wilderness or greens
Key challenges
- Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
- Habitat and biodiversity conservation
- Green space creation and/or management
- Environmental quality
- Soil quality improvement
- Waste management
- Health and well-being (SDG 3)
- Enabling opportunities for physical activity
- Creation of opportunities for recreation
- Sustainable consumption and production (SDG 12)
- Sustainable production
Focus
Maintenance and management of urban nature, Protection of natural ecosystems, Monitoring and maintenance of habitats and/or biodiversity
Project objectives
-Offering a green zone in the middle of the city to the citizens who can enjoy a spectacular view over the city and the volcanoes chain of Auvergne
-Maintain biodiversity by avoiding pesticides
-Habitat for fauna
-Leisure and recreational purposes (jogging, playground areas for children, picnic)
-9 hectares of the park untouched to preserve the "ecological richness" (Ref. 1)
-4 Hives to produce honey (Ref 2)
The LPO designation held by the park has four principles (Ref. 7):
1. Create conditions conducive to the installation of wild fauna and flora
By protecting birds and nature by ensuring the tranquility of the place, in particular during sensitive periods such as during nesting and extreme cold.
By diversifying and developing, depending on the surface of my Refuge, environments favorable to wild flora and fauna, such as a country hedge, a pond or a dry stone wall.
By favoring the planting of species that grow naturally in my region, more resistant to climatic conditions and adapted to the local fauna.
2: Limit use of chemicals
By adopting an ecological management method for my Refuge and by preferring manual weeding techniques or organic products if an intervention is really necessary.
By preferring natural fertilizers (compost, nettle manure, etc.) for demanding plants such as fruit trees or vegetables, by promoting plant associations and disease-reducing auxiliaries.
3: Reduce impact on the environment
By adopting eco-citizen actions, in particular by making reasonable use of natural resources such as water and by recycling my household waste.
4. Create space without hunting for biodiversity
By committing myself not to hunt in the Refuge if it is located in an area where hunting can be practiced.
By taking any useful step, at the initiative and with the advice of the LPO, so that hunting can be prohibited there as soon as possible
Honey production (Ref 1 & 2)
Implementation activities
"Its twenty hectares offer the possibility of great walks and its picnic areas the occasion of pleasant lunches on the grass." (Ref. 2)
No pesticides are used to preserve biodiversity and playgrounds for children (Ref.1)
"4 hives installed" and "Mediterranean garden" (Ref. 2)
"Since 2010, the City and the Unaf (National Union of French Beekeeping) are bound by a convention for the installation, monitoring and exploitation of apiaries"
"In 2016, the city was awarded the APIcité® label, thanks to its local policy on pollinator protection." (Ref. 2)
All those initiatives of preserving habitat and biodiversity have helped the park to receive the label LPO (the first association for the protection of nature in France).
"Located on a hill at an altitude of 486 m, in a protected urbanization zone, this park of 26 hectares, the largest of Clermont-Ferrand, offers a privileged view on the city and on the volcanic chain of Auvergne." (Ref. 1)
Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities
Biodiversity conservation:
- Protect and enhance urban habitats
- Preserve and strengthen existing habitats and ecosystems
- Reduce negative impacts and avoid the alteration/damage of ecosystem
- Protect species
- Undertake specific measures to protect species
- Undertake specific measures to protect valued species
- Means for conservation governance
- Manage biological resources for conservation and sustainable use
- Other
Main beneficiaries
- Local government/Municipality
- Citizens or community groups
Governance
Management set-up
- Government-led
Type of initiating organisation
- Local government/municipality
Participatory approaches/ community involvement
- Unknown
Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project
The park is managed by the City of Clermont Ferrand (Ref. 1 and 2)
The City and the Unaf (National Union of French Beekeeping) are partners by a convention for the installation, monitoring and exploitation of apiaries as 4 hives have been installed in the park. (Ref. 1)
Project implemented in response to ...
... an EU policy or strategy?
Unknown
... a national policy or strategy?
Yes
("Since 2010, the City and the Unaf (National Union of French Beekeeping) are bound by a convention for the installation, monitoring and exploitation of apiaries. Through this partnership, the City is committed to the "Bee, Sentinel of the Environment" operation, to raise awareness among Clermont residents of the essential role of bees in maintaining biodiversity. In 2016, the city was awarded the APIcité® label, thanks to its local policy on pollinator protection." (Ref. 2))
... a local policy or strategy?
Unknown
("In 2016, the city was awarded the APIcité® label, thanks to its local policy on pollinator protection." (Ref. 2))
Financing
Total cost
Unknown
Source(s) of funding
- Public local authority budget
Type of funding
- Earmarked public budget
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Impacts and Monitoring
Environmental impacts
- Green space and habitat
- Increased green space area
- Increased conservation or restoration of ecosystems
- Increase in protected green space areas
- Increased number of species present
- Enhanced support of pollination
- Increased spread of native/heirloom/open-pollinated seed
- Increased ecological connectivity across regeneration sites and scales
Economic impacts
- More sustainable tourism
Socio-cultural impacts
- Social justice and cohesion
- Improved access to urban green space
- Health and wellbeing
- Improved physical health
- Improved mental health
- Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
- Cultural heritage and sense of place
- Improvement in people’s connection to nature
- Other
Type of reported impacts
Expected impacts, Achieved impacts
Presence of formal monitoring system
Unknown
Presence of indicators used in reporting
No evidence in public records
Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports
No evidence in public records
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
References
1. Auvergne Centre France (n.d). "Parc Montjuzet". Parcs & Jardins - Puy de Dome. Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
2. Clermont-Ferrand (n.d)."Le parc de Montjuzet". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
3. Clermont Ferrand (2014). “Rapport 2014 Développement Durable”. Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
4. Ville de Clermont Ferrand (2016). “Plan d’Aménagement and de Développement Durables”. Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
5. LPO (n.d). "Partagez vos observations". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
6. UNAF (2016). "APIcité 2016". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
7. LPO (2017). "Charte Refuges LPO". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
8. France 3 (2019). "Clermont-Ferrand : expérimentation d'une navette entre le centre-ville et le parc Montjuzet". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
2. Clermont-Ferrand (n.d)."Le parc de Montjuzet". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
3. Clermont Ferrand (2014). “Rapport 2014 Développement Durable”. Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
4. Ville de Clermont Ferrand (2016). “Plan d’Aménagement and de Développement Durables”. Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
5. LPO (n.d). "Partagez vos observations". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
6. UNAF (2016). "APIcité 2016". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
7. LPO (2017). "Charte Refuges LPO". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
8. France 3 (2019). "Clermont-Ferrand : expérimentation d'une navette entre le centre-ville et le parc Montjuzet". Available at: Source link (Accessed: July 21, 2020).
