Clermont-Ferrand, France
City population: 280036
Duration: 2012 – 2016
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Sub-microscale: Street scale (including buildings)
Project area: 1480 m2
Type of area: Public Greenspace Area
Last updated: October 2021

"The garden was created in 2012 with the Parenthesis Association. The association closed in 2015. In January 2016 a group of gardeners decided to create a new association to continue their garden, that is when the gardens of Fontgiève were born. In the garden one discusses, one shares, one exchanges, one helps one, one gives oneself advice. The garden produces much more than vegetables and fruits; Ideas germinate there, sharing them is collective intelligence" (Ref.1).

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Community gardens and allotments
  • Community gardens

Key challenges

  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
  • Inclusive governance
  • Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
  • Social interaction
  • Health and well-being (SDG 3)
  • Enabling opportunities for physical activity
  • Improving mental health
  • Creation of opportunities for recreation
  • Sustainable consumption and production (SDG 12)
  • Sustainable consumption
  • Sustainable production

Focus

Creation of new green areas, Maintenance and management of urban nature, Knowledge creation and awareness raising

Project objectives

"It is above all a space for learning how to carry out a collective project together. In the garden there is more than gardening! You can stroll there, rest there observe nature, tinker, decorate, and the pleasure of spending a moment together." (Ref. 2) "We wanted to create at the base a meeting place, social bond in the neighborhood". "It is done in this haven of peace, in this countryside in the city."(Ref. 3) "The idea of shared gardens emanates from civil society, the associative movement ... Behind, it's not just gardening. There is this idea of a shared city." (Ref. 4) "To make nature living in the city" (Ref. 6)

Implementation activities

"Here, no fertilizer but coffee grounds and ashes against slugs; The black soap against the aphids, which also make the happiness of ladybugs". "There is sharing of the harvest or a shared meal. Gardeners may also decide to donate products to an association. Last year, the last tomatoes that had not had time to mature ended up in jars, with garlic and vinegar." (Ref. 3) "In Fontgiève, volunteers organize on-site gourmet meetings, readings, writing workshops ... They also open their haven of peace to the elderly and nursing assistants. As if finally, gardening was only a pretext to meet and go towards the others."(Ref. 4)

Main beneficiaries

  • Citizens or community groups
  • Marginalized groups: Elderly people, Other

Governance

Management set-up

  • Led by non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Local government/municipality
  • Non-government organisation/civil society
  • Citizens or community group

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Co-planning (e.g. stakeholder workshops, focus groups, participatory mapping)
  • Taskforce groups
  • Dissemination of information and education
  • Consultation (e.g. workshop, surveys, community meetings, town halls)
  • Joint implementation (e.g. tree planting)
  • Co-management/Joint management

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

-"Initially, it was managed by the association Parenthèse, which passed on the baby to a handful of volunteers." "We decide together and we collect together. In short, we share everything "sums up Suzy Pradet, president of the new association manager." -"The city accompanies this type of project, for example by making available land." (Ref. 4)

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Unknown
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown
... a local policy or strategy? Unknown

Financing

Total cost

Unknown

Source(s) of funding

  • Funds provided by non-governmental organization (NGO)

Type of funding

  • Membership or entrance fees

Non-financial contribution

Type of non-financial contribution
  • Provision of land
  • Provision of goods
  • Provision of labour
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
  • Public authorities (e.g. land, utility services)
  • Citizens (e.g. volunteering)

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Environmental quality
  • Improved waste management
  • Improved soil quality
  • Green space and habitat
  • Increased green space area
  • Increased conversion of degraded land or soil
  • Reduced biodiversity loss
  • Increased number of species present
  • Enhanced support of pollination
  • Restoration of derelict areas

Economic impacts

  • Increase in agricultural production (for profit or not)
  • Other

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Fair distribution of social, environmental and economic benefits of the NBS project
  • Improved liveability
  • Improved access to urban green space
  • Increased opportunities for social interaction
  • Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
  • Increased access to healthy/affordable food
  • Increased sustainability of agriculture practices
  • Health and wellbeing
  • Improved mental health
  • Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
  • Cultural heritage and sense of place
  • Improvement in people’s connection to nature
  • Preserved spiritual and religious values
  • Increased appreciation for natural spaces
  • Education
  • Increased support for education and scientific research
  • Increased knowledge of locals about local nature
  • Other

Type of reported impacts

Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References