The Chiangmai urban farm was developed on a former landfill site in the Chiangmai city centre area. The project was initiated by a local community architecture studio and supported by various groups of the local NGOs, civic groups and the local government. The project began in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, aiming to help vulnerable people in the communities nearby the site to increase food security, improve nutrition and build a self-sufficiency lifestyle. Moreover, the urban farm is designed to be a ‘public space’ that connects people from different backgrounds through agriculture. The Farm consists of various garden plots ideal for short-harvest and long-harvest species, a chicken coop, a plant nursery and a storage area. Knowledge sharing and capacity building are other goals of the project. Accordingly, training and workshops are organised in the bamboo pavilion of the garden. Since its establishment, the urban farm provides the local community with farming and learning opportunities and a space to socialize. The financial background of the project was provided through fundraising and the efforts of volunteers who developed this project into a self-sustaining farm without relying on donations. (Ref.1,2,4,9)
Overview
Nature-based solution
- Community gardens and allotments
- Allotments
- Community gardens
- Parks and urban forests
- Pocket parks/neighbourhood green spaces
Key challenges
- Environmental quality
- Soil quality improvement
- Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
- Green space creation and/or management
- Regeneration, land-use and urban development
- Conversion of former industrial areas
- Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
- Inclusive governance
- Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
- Social interaction
- Environmental education
- Economic development and employment (SDG 8)
- Economic development: agriculture
- Employment/job creation
- Sustainable consumption and production (SDG 12)
- Sustainable production
Focus
Project objectives
Implementation activities
Main beneficiaries
- Citizens or community groups
- Marginalized groups: Socio-economically disadvantaged populations (e.g. low-income households, unemployed)
Governance
Management set-up
- Led by non-government actors
Type of initiating organisation
- District/neighbourhood association
- Citizens or community group
- Private sector/corporate actor/company
Participatory approaches/ community involvement
- Co-planning (e.g. stakeholder workshops, focus groups, participatory mapping)
- Crowd-sourcing/Crowd-funding/Participatory budget
- Joint implementation (e.g. tree planting)
- Co-management/Joint management
Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project
Project implemented in response to ...
Financing
Total cost
Source(s) of funding
- Crowdfunding
- Private Foundation/Trust
Type of funding
- Loan
- Donations
Non-financial contribution
- Provision of land
- Provision of goods
- Provision of labour
- Provision of expertise
- Provision of other services
- Public authorities (e.g. land, utility services)
- Citizens (e.g. volunteering)
- Private sector (businesses, financial institution)
Impacts and Monitoring
Environmental impacts
- Environmental quality
- Improved soil quality
- Green space and habitat
- Increased green space area
- Increased conversion of degraded land or soil
- Restoration of derelict areas
Economic impacts
- Increase of green jobs (e.g. paid employment positions)
- Increase in agricultural production (for profit or not)
Socio-cultural impacts
- Social justice and cohesion
- Increased visibility and opportunity for marginalised groups or indigenous peoples
- Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
- Increased access to healthy/affordable food
- Increased sustainability of agriculture practices
- Education
- Increased support for education and scientific research
- Increased awareness of NBS and their benefits
Type of reported impacts
Presence of formal monitoring system
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
References
2. A Day (2020), สวนผักคนเมืองเชียงใหม่: กลุ่มคนที่เปลี่ยนพื้นที่รกร้างให้เป็นสวนผักใจกว้างเลี้ยงคนเชียงใหม่, Available at Source link (Accessed 09-02-2023)
3. The Active (2021), เมื่อที่รกร้างกลางเมืองเชียงใหม่ กลายเป็น “สวนผักสาธารณะ” การันตีรางวัลระดับโลก, Available at Source link (Accessed 09-02-2023)
4. SDG Move (2021), คุยกับ ศุภวุฒิ บุญมหาธนากร: สวนผักคนเมืองเชียงใหม่ กับการก่อร่างฝันบนความยั่งยืน, Available at Source link (Accessed 10-02-2023)
5. City Cracker (2021), ศุภวุฒิ บุญมหาธนากร กับ เบื้องหลังความสำเร็จของ ‘สวนผักคนเมืองเชียงใหม่’, Available at Source link (Accessed 10-02-2023)
6. MGR Online (2020), ผุด “สวนผักคนเมืองเชียงใหม่” สร้างความมั่นคงทางอาหารเพิ่มพื้นที่สีเขียวเชิงคุณภาพ, Available at Source link (Accessed 10-02-2023)
7. SCG Foundation (2020), สวนผัก สู้วิกฤติโควิด, Available at Source link (Accessed 12-02-2023)
8. Chiangmai Urban Farm (2020), สวนผักคนเมืองเชียงใหม่, Available at Source link (Accessed 12-02-2023)
9. Baanlaesuan (2021), พลังประชาชนที่เปลี่ยน “กองขยะ” สู่ “สวนผักคนเมืองเชียงใหม่”, Available at Source link (Accessed 12-02-2023)
10. Rainbow Media (2020), คนเปลี่ยนโลก SS6 TAPE 49 : สวนผักคนเมืองเจียงใหม่, Available at Source link (Accessed 12-02-2023)