The Kok River which runs through Chiang Rai City is in the process of being ecologically restored (Ref. 1). Having previously been a "lifeline for the city and various communities along its banks", sections of the river ran dry 20 years ago due to the construction of a large scale diversion channel and dredging by a major hotel (Ref. 2). In addition to reestablishing the river flow, restoration efforts are focusing on the opportunity to provide additional water storage, flood reduction and urban greening (Refs. 1 & 4). These improvements are considered particularly important given that the city of Chiang Rai is "expected to be affected by climate-induced drought as a result of changing rainfall patterns; rain which may also be heavy at times leading to excessive runoff into such channels; and flooding" (Ref. 4). To date, wetlands have been restored, and community benefits, such as a walking path, created (Ref. 3). Improved water circulation and quality are further going to minimise the occurrence of breeding grounds for disease vectors (Ref. 4). Whilst already recognised as a problem, vector-borne and waterborne diseases are anticipated to become more prevalent due to increased temperatures associated with climate change (Ref. 4).
Overview
Nature-based solution
- Blue infrastructure
- Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
- In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
- Grey infrastructure featuring greens
- Riverbank/Lakeside greens
Key challenges
- Climate action for adaptation, resilience and mitigation (SDG 13)
- Climate change adaptation
- Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
- Habitat and biodiversity restoration
- Water management (SDG 6)
- Flood protection
- Stormwater and rainfall management and storage
- Improvements to water quality
- Health and well-being (SDG 3)
- Creation of opportunities for recreation
- Economic development and employment (SDG 8)
- Economic development: agriculture
Focus
Project objectives
Implementation activities
Climate-focused activities
Climate change adaptation:
- Implement solutions to capture/store water to increase its availability and prevent shortages from droughts
- Restore wetlands and/or coastal ecosystems to dissipate the effects of flooding and/or storms
- Renaturalization of rivers and other water bodies
- Other
Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities
Biodiversity restoration:
- Rehabilitate and restore damaged or destroyed ecosystems
Main beneficiaries
- Citizens or community groups
- Food producers and cultivators (i.e. farmers, gardeners)
Governance
Management set-up
- Co-governance with government and non-government actors
Type of initiating organisation
- Non-government organisation/civil society
Participatory approaches/ community involvement
- Consultation (e.g. workshop, surveys, community meetings, town halls)
Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project
Project implemented in response to ...
Financing
Total cost
Source(s) of funding
- Unknown
Type of funding
- Unknown
Non-financial contribution
Impacts and Monitoring
Environmental impacts
- Climate change
- Strengthened capacity to address climate hazards/natural disasters
- Water management and blue areas
- Improved water quality
- Enhanced protection and restoration of freshwater ecosystems
- Green space and habitat
- Increased green space area
Economic impacts
- Unknown
Socio-cultural impacts
- Social justice and cohesion
- Improved liveability
- Improved access to urban green space
- Increased involvement of locals in the management of green spaces
- Increased access to healthy/affordable food
- Health and wellbeing
- Improved physical health
- Gain in activities for recreation and exercise
- Cultural heritage and sense of place
- Improvement in people’s connection to nature
- Protection of natural heritage
- Safety
- Improved community safety to climate-related hazards
- Other
- Unknown
Type of reported impacts
Presence of formal monitoring system
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
References
2. Rumbaitis Del Rio, C (2015). Ecosystems and the Resilience Dividend. Bangkok: Rockefeller Foundation. Source link [accessed 4/10/21];
3. ICMA (2013). Learning from Malaysia, Thailand, Lao PDR and Indonesia at the Climate Leadership Academy. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association. Source link [accessed 4/10/21];
4. Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (2013). ACCCRN City Projects. Bangkok: Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (ACCCRN) & The Rockefeller Foundation, Asia Office. Source link [accessed 4/10/21];
5. Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (2014). ACCCRN City Projects. Bangkok: Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (ACCCRN) & The Rockefeller Foundation, Asia Office. Source link [accessed 4/10/21];
6. The Rockefeller Foundation Monitoring and Evaluation Office, Verulam Associates Ltd. and Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (2014). Summative Evaluation:
The Rockefeller Foundation Asian Cities
Climate Change Resilience Network
Initiative. Bangkok: The Rockefeller Foundation, Asia Office. Source link [accessed 4/10/21];
7. Asian Development Bank (2016). Nature-Based Solutions for Building Resilience in Towns and Cities: Case Studies from the Greater Mekong Subregion. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank. Source link [accessed 4/10/21];
8. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (n.d.). Urban Ecosystem and Biodiversity Conservation towards Sustainable City and Climate Change Resilience. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme: Urban Agenda Platform. Source link [accessed 4/10/21]; and
9. Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (n.d.). ACCCRN - Thailand: Chiang Rai City. Nonthaburi: Thailand Environmental Institute. Source link [accessed 5/10/21].
