Bucuresti, Romania
City population: 1877541
Duration: 2008 – 2009
Implementation status: Completed
Scale: Micro-scale: District/neighbourhood level
Project area: 10000 m2
Type of area: Industrial, Residential
Last updated: October 2021

An urban park located in front of the central train station in Bucharest, built in 1937, and rehabilitated in 2008, as a response to an environmental awareness campaign. The park is a buffer green zone between the train station and the industrial neighborhood (1)

Parcul Gării de Nord
Source: http://wikimapia.org/59742/ro/Parcul-G%C4%83rii-de-Nord#/photo/2482653

Overview

Nature-based solution

  • Grey infrastructure featuring greens
  • Institutional green space
  • Parks and urban forests
  • Large urban parks or forests

Key challenges

  • Climate action for adaptation, resilience and mitigation (SDG 13)
  • Climate change adaptation
  • Climate change mitigation
  • Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
  • Green space creation and/or management
  • Environmental quality
  • Air quality improvement
  • Noise reduction
  • Regeneration, land-use and urban development
  • Promote natural styles of landscape design for urban development

Focus

Creation of new green areas

Project objectives

1. To ensure the rehabilitation of the park in order to reduce air pollution level and carbon sequestration (1); 2. To act as a buffer zone in a noisy area (2); 3. To allow access to a green area in an industrial quarter (3); 4. To counterbalance the aesthetics of the area since the park is the only green space in a grey zone (1); 5. To reduce summer temperatures (2).

Implementation activities

British American Tobacco summoned its own employees to provide manual labor. (2)

Climate-focused activities

Climate change adaptation:

  • Increase or improve urban vegetation cover to help reduce outdoor temperature
  • Create or improve outdoor spaces to help people escape from urban heat

Climate change mitigation:

  • Improve carbon sequestration through selection of more adaptable species

Main beneficiaries

  • Local government/Municipality
  • Non-government organisation/Civil Society
  • Private sector/Corporate/Company
  • Citizens or community groups
  • Young people and children

Governance

Management set-up

  • Co-governance with government and non-government actors

Type of initiating organisation

  • Local government/municipality
  • Private sector/corporate actor/company

Participatory approaches/ community involvement

  • Unknown

Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project

The municipality of Bucharest was the initiator of the intervention since it had a campaign called, Adopt a green space. As such British American Tobacco, as the executor of the innovation adopted the Central Station Park and use it to develop, among others, cohesion between its employees (3)

Project implemented in response to ...

... an EU policy or strategy? Yes (The intervention mentions the 2004/35/CE, Council of Europe Directive in regards to Environmental Protection (7))
... a national policy or strategy? Unknown
... a local policy or strategy? Unknown

Financing

Total cost

€100,000 - €500,000

Source(s) of funding

  • Corporate investment

Type of funding

  • Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)

Non-financial contribution

Type of non-financial contribution
  • Provision of land
  • Provision of goods
  • Provision of labour
  • Provision of expertise
Who provided the non-financial contribution?
  • Citizens (e.g. volunteering)
  • Private sector (businesses, financial institution)

Impacts and Monitoring

Environmental impacts

  • Environmental quality
  • Improved air quality
  • Green space and habitat
  • Increased green space area

Economic impacts

  • Unknown

Socio-cultural impacts

  • Social justice and cohesion
  • Improved social cohesion

Type of reported impacts

Expected impacts, Achieved impacts

Presence of formal monitoring system

Unknown

Presence of indicators used in reporting

No evidence in public records

Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports

No evidence in public records

Availability of a web-based monitoring tool

No evidence in public records

References