Last updated: June 2024
Management of natural lime-dry grasslands on gravel banks in Augsburg is conducted by the Landcape Association of the City of Augsburg (Bavaria, Germany). 300 ha of biotopes within the municipal area is maintained due to sheep grazing, mowing management, scrub clearance and reopening of potential expansion areas as well as further activities to create initial stages of immature soils and recreational purposes (Ref. 1).
Overview
Nature-based solution
- Blue infrastructure
- Rivers/streams/canals/estuaries
- In-land wetlands, peatlands, swamps, and moors
- Parks and urban forests
- Large urban parks or forests
Key challenges
- Environmental quality
- Soil quality improvement
- Green space, habitats and biodiversity (SDG 15)
- Habitat and biodiversity conservation
- Green space creation and/or management
- Water management (SDG 6)
- Flood protection
- Improvements to water quality
- Cultural heritage and cultural diversity
- Preservation of historic traditions
- Health and well-being (SDG 3)
- Creation of opportunities for recreation
- Inclusive and effective governance (SDG 16)
- Effective management
- Social justice, cohesion and equity (SDG 10)
- Environmental education
- Economic development and employment (SDG 8)
- Tourism support
Focus
Maintenance and management of urban nature, Management and improved protection of rivers and other blue areas
Project objectives
1. To prevent the loss of biodiversity along the Augsburg city forest backwaters (Ref. 1)
2. Integration of protected biotope areas (Ref. 1)
3. Sustainable landscape management and development of water-related biotopes in the Stadtwald Augsburg (Ref. 1,4)
4. Creation of an integrated natural reserve Stadtwald Augsburg for the recreation of local citizens and tourists (Ref. 3)
Implementation activities
1. To realize a connected habitat system linear structures such as embankments, river dikes, and transmission routes
are used (Ref. 1)
2. Return of streams to natural channels (Ref. 4)
3. Environmental education and dissemination of information among citizens (Ref. 1)
4. Uncleaned sewage and pollutants from intensively cultivated areas removed further from the protected area (Ref. 6)
5. Sustainable landscape management through controlled, historic grazing practices of animals (Ref. 1)
Biodiversity conservation or restoration-focused activities
Biodiversity conservation:
- Protect and enhance urban habitats
- Preserve and strengthen existing habitats and ecosystems
- Preserve and strengthen habitat connectivity
- Reduce negative impacts and avoid the alteration/damage of ecosystem
- Means for conservation governance
- Raise public awareness
Main beneficiaries
- Citizens or community groups
Governance
Management set-up
- Government-led
Type of initiating organisation
- Public sector institution
Participatory approaches/ community involvement
- Unknown
Details on the roles of the organisations involved in the project
Augsburg Landscape Care Association (Landschaftspflegeverband City of Augsburg e.V.) (Ref. 1). The Association conducted management and oversaw the process of regeneration of natural lime-dry grasslands on gravel banks in Augsburg (Ref. 1). "The Landschaftspflegeverband Stadt Augsburg e.V. (LPVA), sponsored by the German
Federal Environment Foundation, for a project period of five years from 2007 to the end of 2011
Pre-alpine pine forests on river gravel in the nature reserve "Stadtwald Augsburg" with red deer
and Przewalski's horses grazed. The calculated total project costs amounted to € 249,752.50.
The requested funding share was 124,876.25 € (corresponds to 50%)" (Ref. 8).
Project implemented in response to ...
... an EU policy or strategy?
Yes
(European Water Framework Directive (Ref. 7) is mentioned in connection to the project. )
... a national policy or strategy?
Yes
(The project takes into consideration restrictions and provisions of drinking water protection and the Forest Act for Bavaria (BayWaldG) (Ref. 1).)
... a local policy or strategy?
Yes
(The NBS is realized within the requirements of the protected natural reserve „Stadtwald Augsburg“ (1)
)
Financing
Total cost
€50,000 - €100,000
Source(s) of funding
- Public national budget
Type of funding
- Direct funding (grants, subsidies, or self-financed projects by private entities)
Non-financial contribution
Unknown
Impacts and Monitoring
Environmental impacts
- Environmental quality
- Improved soil quality
- Water management and blue areas
- Improved water quality
- Increased protection against flooding
- Enhanced protection and restoration of freshwater ecosystems
- Green space and habitat
- Increased conversion of degraded land or soil
- Reduced biodiversity loss
- Increased number of species present
Economic impacts
- Unknown
Socio-cultural impacts
- Cultural heritage and sense of place
- Protection of natural heritage
- Protection of historic and cultural landscape / infrastructure
- Education
- Increased support for education and scientific research
- Increased awareness of NBS and their benefits
Type of reported impacts
Achieved impacts
Presence of formal monitoring system
Yes
Presence of indicators used in reporting
Yes
Presence of monitoring/ evaluation reports
Yes
Availability of a web-based monitoring tool
No evidence in public records
References
1. LIEBIG, N. (2011). Management von Flussschotterheiden in Augsburg. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
2. Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz (n.d.). Landschaftspflege- und Naturparkrichtlinien (LNPR). Available at: Source link. (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
3. Regio Augsburg Tourismus (n.d.). Wandern. Touren im Alpenvorland um Augsburg. Available at: Source link (Website not available in 2020).
4. Wandern. Touren im Alpenvorland um Augsburg (2007). Enthaltung und Entwicklung von Flussschotterheiden. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
5. Nature tips (2008). Problem Landschaftszerschneidung Lebensraumvernetzung durch Biotopverbund. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
6. Nature tips (2012). Renaturierung von Fließgewässern Neues Leben für Flüsse und Bäche. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
7. Stadt Zeitung (2016). Zu wenig Wasser und fehlende Anbindung an den Lech: An den Stadtwaldbächen gibt es viel zu tun. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
8. Landschaftsplfegeverband Stadt Augsburd E.V. (2007). Beweidungsprojekt Stadtwald Augsburg. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
2. Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz (n.d.). Landschaftspflege- und Naturparkrichtlinien (LNPR). Available at: Source link. (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
3. Regio Augsburg Tourismus (n.d.). Wandern. Touren im Alpenvorland um Augsburg. Available at: Source link (Website not available in 2020).
4. Wandern. Touren im Alpenvorland um Augsburg (2007). Enthaltung und Entwicklung von Flussschotterheiden. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
5. Nature tips (2008). Problem Landschaftszerschneidung Lebensraumvernetzung durch Biotopverbund. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
6. Nature tips (2012). Renaturierung von Fließgewässern Neues Leben für Flüsse und Bäche. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
7. Stadt Zeitung (2016). Zu wenig Wasser und fehlende Anbindung an den Lech: An den Stadtwaldbächen gibt es viel zu tun. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
8. Landschaftsplfegeverband Stadt Augsburd E.V. (2007). Beweidungsprojekt Stadtwald Augsburg. Available at: Source link (Accessed: November 5, 2020).
